Yes, in the annals of Australian history, the name Ben Hall stands out as one of the most infamous and intriguing figures of the 19th century. Born in a penal colony, raised in the rugged Australian bush, Hall's life story is as captivating as it is tragic.
This Website, "Ben Hall: From Stockman to Bushranger," aims to delve into the life and times of this notorious bushranger. Drawing from historical records, newspaper accounts, and personal testimonies, we will journey through Hall's life, from his humble beginnings in New South Wales to his violent end at the hands of the NSW police.
Ben Hall was not born a criminal. He was a child of convicts, yes, but he was also a skilled stockman, a loving brother, and father. A respected member of his community. So, how did this young man, known for his good looks and charm, become one of the most feared bushrangers in Australian history? What forces drove him to a life of crime? And how did his actions impact the lives of those around him and the course of Australian history?
In the following webpages, we will explore these questions and more. We will delve into the societal and historical context of Hall's life, shedding light on the conditions that gave rise to bushranging in 19th-century Australia. We will also examine Hall's personal relationships, his criminal exploits, and the legacy he left behind.
"Ben Hall: From Stockman to Bushranger" is more than just a biography. It is a journey into a fascinating and tumultuous period in Australian history, seen through the eyes of one of its most notorious figures. So, let us embark on this journey together, into the life and times of Ben Hall, the bushranger who captured the imagination and fear of a nation. (All historical related articles incorporated into the narrative are coloured and transcribed as published.)
His father, Benjamin Hall senior, was born at Bristol, England, in 1805. Convicted of theft, he was sentenced to seven years' transportation and arrived at Port Jackson in 1827 aboard the Midas. Ben's mother, Eliza Somers, was born in Dublin in 1808 and likewise received a seven-year sentence for theft. She reached New South Wales in 1830 aboard the Asia I.
![]() |
| Hall's Creek Area. Google Earth image. |
Upon reaching the Barnard River district, the Hall family established a modest homestead beside a small creek that flowed into the river. Benjamin Hall senior built their dwelling on its banks, and in later years the watercourse became known as Ben Hall's Creek, a reminder of the family's long association with the locality. The country was remote, rugged and heavily timbered. Winters were often bitterly cold, with snow not uncommon on the surrounding ranges, while the summers could be intensely hot. Later residents would simply describe it as "very mountainous country,"¹ a landscape that demanded resilience from those who attempted to make a living there.
The route by which the family reached this isolated district can be reconstructed with reasonable confidence. A. A. McLellan, in Benjamin Hall and Family, suggests that the Halls most likely followed the inland track established by the Australian Agricultural Company, travelling through Arden Hall, Belltrees and Ellerston before joining the Walcha Track to Glenrock. From there they descended to the junction of the Barnard River and the creek that would later bear the Hall name.
For Benjamin Hall senior, survival depended upon resourcefulness rather than capital. Like many frontier settlers of the period, he built his herd by capturing wild cattle and horses that roamed the surrounding valleys. These animals, descendants of stock that had strayed from earlier pastoral runs, provided the foundation of the family's livelihood. Through hard work and bushcraft, the Halls gradually established themselves in a district where self-reliance was essential, and neighbours were few.
It was in this isolated frontier environment that Ben Hall spent his earliest years. Surrounded by horses, cattle and the daily demands of pastoral life, he acquired the practical bush skills that later became second nature. The rugged country of Murrurundi, with its steep ranges, dense timber and hidden valleys, formed the backdrop of his childhood and instilled the horsemanship, endurance and intimate knowledge of the Australian bush that would later prove invaluable during his years as a stockman—and, ultimately, as a bushranger.
| Benjamin Hall land purchase Haydonton. Courtesy Haydon papers Vol-3 |
"The first parcel to be sold was 2 acres situated on the south side of the main road at the ford and is the parcel of land now bounded by Mayne, Adelaide and Liverpool Streets and the Page's River. The purchaser was Benjamin Hall, a ticket-of-leave holder, but an independent grazier from Breeza where he had been employed by Samuel Clift. He paid £140, a price which indicated that there was probably a hut on the land."
Benjamin Hall senior quickly improved the holding. The original hut was enlarged into a more substantial slab-built residence roofed with bark and containing three bedrooms. As the family's circumstances improved, additional buildings were erected, including a butcher's shop and a blacksmith's forge. Together these transformed the property from a simple frontier dwelling into a productive family enterprise that served both the growing township and travellers passing through the district.
The success of the Hall family was no accident. Recent research into Benjamin Hall senior's background has confirmed that before his conviction and transportation he had worked in England as a butcher, or skinner. Those skills, carried with him across the world despite his convict sentence, proved invaluable in colonial New South Wales. They enabled him to establish a prosperous butchering business at Haydonton and provide his young family with a level of stability and prosperity uncommon among recently emancipated convicts.
For young Ben Hall, the move marked another important stage in his upbringing. Instead of being raised solely in the isolation of the frontier, he now grew up within a busy rural settlement where drovers, stockmen, blacksmiths, teamsters and travellers were part of everyday life. His father's success also demonstrated an important lesson: in colonial Australia, determination, practical skill and hard work could allow even former convicts to build respectable and prosperous lives.
![]() |
Reputed home of the
Hall family,
Murrurundi.
However, this may actually be the rented home of Dr Hallett. c. 1900. Courtesy A.A. McLellan. |
In 1854, amid growing marital difficulties, the property was advertised for sale. The advertisement provides one of the most detailed contemporary descriptions of the Hall family's home:
"In the flourishing town of Haydonton... are erected a snug cottage, three rooms, butcher's shop, kitchen, blacksmith's shop; a splendid well of water, commanding from ten to fifteen feet of water in dry seasons; a small orchard, garden, three stock yards, two gallows; and the whole is enclosed by a four-railed fence. The property's situation is eligible, having an extensive frontage, and commands the main thoroughfare to all the Northern Diggings."
Research contained within the Haydon Family Papers suggests that the Hall held two residences and the one depicted (right) may have been the bark-roofed slab cottage later rented to Dr Hallett on Mayne Street. If correct, this would identify one of the few surviving visual associations with Ben Hall's childhood home.
There also was a medical practitioner residing in Haydonton in a house belonging to Benjamin Hall - Dr Hallett.
Townsend was struck by the contentment of the inhabitants. Most families, he observed, owned cattle running upon the surrounding country and consequently "were at no loss either for meat, or a matter of constant interest." His description portrays a settlement that, although isolated, possessed the confidence and optimism characteristic of an expanding pastoral frontier.
It was in this environment that Ben Hall spent his formative years. Alongside his elder brothers—Thomas Wade, William and Edward—he helped capture and muster wild cattle and horses in the rugged country surrounding Murrurundi. These were not merely childhood adventures but an essential contribution to the family's livelihood. The work demanded courage, horsemanship and intimate familiarity with difficult country. Long before Hall became known as a bushranger, he had earned a reputation as an accomplished horseman and bushman. The skills acquired during these years would later enable him to travel extraordinary distances, evade police through difficult terrain and survive where less experienced riders could not.
Despite its later importance, Haydonton remained a very small settlement. In 1841 neighbouring Murrurundi contained only eleven houses and a population of fifty-two people, while Haydonton itself was even smaller, with just twenty-two residents. Yet each settlement possessed an inn that served as its social and commercial centre—the White Swan at Murrurundi and the White Hart at Haydonton. Around these establishments revolved much of the district's business, travel and exchange of news.
Educational opportunities were equally limited. Formal schooling scarcely existed during Hall's early childhood. Instruction was initially provided informally by James Gowan, a former lock-up keeper who acted more as a tutor than a professional schoolmaster. Recognising the deficiencies, Thomas Haydon led efforts to establish a National School for the district. At the time, some 120 school-aged children had no regular access to education following the departure of the Reverend George Anderson.
Funding such a school proved difficult. Parents were asked to contribute five pounds annually—a considerable burden for frontier families—while also assisting with the construction of both the schoolhouse and the master's residence. Despite these obstacles, a National School finally opened in 1851 under the direction of Alexander Brodie and his sister, Mrs Reid.
| Hall's mark. Marriage Certificate. |
Therefore, records do not indicate that Ben Hall attended any school. Unlike his elder sister Mary, whereas Ben remained illiterate throughout his life, signing documents with an X. What is clear is that his real education lay beyond the classroom. The hills, rivers and stock routes of the Upper Hunter became his school; horses, cattle and the demanding routines of pastoral life his teachers. It was an upbringing that produced not only an accomplished stockman but one of the finest horsemen of his generation.
Livestock remained central to the family's prosperity. Like many small settlers on the colonial frontier, the Halls relied upon cattle and horses as both working assets and stores of wealth. Yet ownership of stock in the unsettled districts of New South Wales was frequently accompanied by suspicion. Stock wandered over vast unfenced runs, brands were altered or removed, and proving ownership could be difficult. The line between legitimate acquisition and stock theft was often blurred, particularly in districts where escaped animals and wild cattle roamed freely.
By 1845, Benjamin Hall senior had come under increasing scrutiny. Local opinion increasingly regarded him as a cattle and horse thief, and allegations concerning the origin of his livestock became more persistent. Whether every accusation was justified is difficult to determine today, but contemporary records demonstrate that his reputation had become firmly tarnished.
The atmosphere of Haydonton itself did little to discourage such behaviour. As a frontier settlement serving travellers, stockmen and teamsters, the township acquired a reputation for heavy drinking, gambling and frequent disorder. The White Hart Inn became the centre of much of this activity, and even members of the local police were not immune to its influence.
A correspondent to The Australian painted an unflattering picture of the settlement in April 1843 after the district's Chief Constable, William Shields, seriously injured himself while allegedly intoxicated. According to the report, Shields had been displaying his horsemanship outside the White Hart after consuming excessive liquor, attempting to leap logs to entertain spectators. The correspondent observed that Haydonton had become a gathering place for "low life characters," where horse racing, cricket and other diversions were of almost daily occurrence, adding pointedly that the constables themselves were enthusiastic participants rather than impartial guardians of the peace.
Whether exaggerated or not, the article reflects the reputation Haydonton had acquired during the early 1840s. It was a settlement where policing was often imperfect, alcohol flowed freely, and respectable citizens lived alongside men whose occupations and characters were considerably less certain.
Concerned by the growing social problems, Thomas Haydon attempted to improve conditions by establishing a Temperance Society. Although membership remained modest, Haydon later remarked upon what he believed was a noticeable improvement in the behaviour and appearance of the township's inhabitants, recording that "the change in morals and appearance of the people is wonderful."
For Benjamin Hall senior, however, improving public morals came too late.
The allegations surrounding his stock dealings eventually attracted official attention, culminating in the issue of a warrant for his arrest on a charge of horse stealing. Before the authorities could execute the warrant, James Gowan—the town's lock-up keeper and a friend of Hall senior—warned him that his arrest was imminent. Gowan's loyalty cost him his position; once his actions became known, he was dismissed from the service.
Forewarned, Benjamin Hall senior fled before the police arrived. Assisted by his wife Eliza and his eldest son William, he escaped from Haydonton and travelled approximately two hundred miles south into the Lachlan district, placing considerable distance between himself and the authorities.
The flight marked a decisive turning point in the fortunes of the Hall family. Young Ben Hall was still only a boy, yet he had now witnessed the collapse of his father's respectable position within the community. The successful butcher, property owner and independent settler became a fugitive from the law. The move to the Lachlan would remove the family from the relative stability of the Upper Hunter and place them within another frontier district—one that would ultimately become inseparable from Ben Hall's own life and legend.
![]() |
| Ben Hall's father Wanted. Courtesy N.L.A. |
![]() |
William Hall, aged eleven, Parramatta Gaol Entrance Book, 4th October 1845.
|
When William Hall's trial commenced at Maitland in March 1846, the young boy found himself in the impossible position of giving evidence in proceedings that centred upon his own father. Despite the pressures placed upon him during months of imprisonment, William initially attempted to shield Benjamin Hall senior from implication.
His efforts quickly drew the attention of the presiding judge.
When asked to identify the man who had accompanied him to Abbott's Run, William deliberately withheld the individual's name. The judge immediately intervened, explaining that identifying the person would not incriminate him merely by naming him. Only after this rebuke did William reluctantly answer that the man was "Benjamin Hall, his father."
The exchange demonstrated both the boy's instinctive loyalty and the emotional conflict in which he found himself. Even after months in custody and separation from his family, William's first reaction was still to protect his father.
Under further examination, however, he made admissions that proved deeply damaging to Benjamin Hall senior's defence. William acknowledged that he had himself been involved in horse stealing, although he attempted to minimise his own participation. He stated that he had not "quite helped" to kill the mares, adding that the actual killing had been carried out by his father and William Butler.
The evidence offered the court a rare insight into the operation of organised horse stealing in the colony. The destruction of branded mares allowed their unbranded foals to be retained and later claimed as legitimately acquired stock. Whether William fully appreciated the significance of his testimony is doubtful, but his evidence directly connected his father with the offences under investigation.
Not all contemporary observers viewed the boy sympathetically.
One newspaper contrasted William's youth with what it regarded as his apparent familiarity with criminal deception, remarking:
"But that of Hall, a boy, although young in years, evidently old in crime, and well versed in dissimulation."
Nevertheless, the proceedings left an enduring impression upon the Hall family.
Young Ben Hall watched as his elder brother was publicly examined, imprisoned and portrayed in the colonial press as already corrupted by crime. Before Ben had reached adolescence, he had witnessed his father's transformation into a wanted stock thief, his family's public disgrace, his mother's rejection of William following his testimony, and the criminal courts becoming deeply entwined with the fortunes of the Hall household.
These experiences formed part of the environment in which Ben Hall grew to maturity. Long before he became a bushranger himself, he had been exposed to the realities of colonial policing, criminal prosecution and the devastating effect that accusations of stock theft could have upon an entire family.
![]() |
| Mary Hall c. 1905. Penzig. |
Benjamin Hall senior intended that his family should eventually join him in the Lachlan after his escape from Murrurundi. Those plans, however, never came to fruition.
Eliza Hall, then heavily pregnant with the couple's youngest child, Ellen, refused to undertake the journey. According to A. A. McLellan in Benjamin Hall and Family, her decision was based upon both practical necessity and bitter personal experience. She objected to the long and arduous journey into the Lachlan and dreaded returning to the primitive frontier conditions she had endured during the family's earlier years at Hall's Creek.
McLellan records:
"However, Eliza, who was then pregnant, objected to moving both on the ground of the long and tedious journey to get to the Lachlan area and that she and the children would be returning to primitive conditions she had endured."
Rather than the entire household relocating, the family was divided. Benjamin Hall senior departed for the Lachlan accompanied by four of his children, including young Ben, while Eliza remained behind at Murrurundi with the others to await the birth of Ellen.
The separation proved permanent.
Among those left behind was Ben's elder brother Edward. Contemporary family accounts suggest that Edward deeply resented both his father's departure and the decision to take Ben instead of him. Whether that choice reflected Benjamin Hall senior's particular confidence in his younger son or simply practical considerations cannot now be known, but it appears to have created a lasting estrangement between father and son that was never repaired.
For Ben Hall, the consequences were profound. The journey to the Lachlan marked the beginning of a new life under the guidance of his father, separated from the influence of his mother and the settled community in which he had spent his childhood. It was also, unknowingly, a final farewell.
Ben Hall never saw his mother again.
Eliza Hall remained in the Upper Hunter, where she gave birth to her youngest child, Ellen. She lived until 1869, surviving both her estranged husband and the bushranging career of the son who had left with him more than twenty years earlier. By the time of her death, Ben Hall himself had been dead for four years, killed beside Billabong Creek on 5 May 1865.
The family's division in 1845 therefore became far more than a temporary separation. It marked the point at which Ben Hall's upbringing diverged permanently from that of the siblings who remained with their mother. From then onward, his formative years would be spent in the Lachlan under the influence of Benjamin Hall senior—a man already living beyond the reach of the law and immersed in the rough pastoral frontier that would ultimately shape his son's destiny.
Ben came under the supervision of Hamilton's head stockman, William Jones. Working cattle across the Lachlan country provided a demanding apprenticeship. Stockmen were required to muster across immense unfenced runs, control difficult cattle and horses, negotiate rivers and scrub, and remain in the saddle for long periods far from the homestead. Hall excelled at the work.
Another of Hamilton's stockmen was James Newell, who became an important friend of the young Hall. Through Newell, Ben was introduced to Daniel Charters, Newell's brother-in-law. Newell had married Charters' sister Agnes in 1850, bringing the families into close association.
The friendship between Hall and Charters would prove particularly consequential.
At this stage there was nothing inherently criminal about their association. They were young men moving within the interconnected world of stockmen, small settlers and pastoral workers of the Lachlan. Yet little more than a decade later Charters would ride with Hall in the Eugowra gold escort robbery and then turn approver, providing evidence against his former companions. The friendship established during Hall's adolescence would therefore eventually become entwined with both his rise into bushranging and the prosecution of those involved in its most spectacular crime.
The Newell family themselves became well established in the district, living for a period at Tommanbil and later becoming associated with several local businesses, including a hotel at Bandon near Eugowra. The relationship between the families appears to have endured. In August 1865, only three months after Hall's death, Agnes Newell gave birth to a son whom the family named Benjamin.
Hall's apprenticeship under William Jones also produced another enduring friendship.
Jones' career as head stockman came to an abrupt end during a muster in the vicinity of Tom Speck's property at The Gap. His horse fell heavily, breaking his thigh and leaving him stranded and badly injured. He remained alone for some time before a party of stockmen found him. Among those involved in assisting the injured man were Ben Hall and Cornelius O'Donnell.
The injury was severe. Jones' leg was roughly set before he could be transported to Bathurst, and his recovery was prolonged. He was eventually left with a pronounced limp that earned him the enduring nickname "Hoppy" Jones.
Many years later the Forbes Times recalled the accident:
"Jones was out mustering in the vicinity of Speck's Gap when his horse fell, breaking the rider's thigh. He lay there alone for a considerable time before being discovered... One of his assistants was a young man named Benjamin Hall."
Unable, or perhaps unwilling, to return permanently to the demanding life of a stockman, Jones eventually entered the hotel trade. At Bathurst he became publican of the Lachlan Inn, situated at the corner of Seymour and Lambert Streets, near what is now Centennial Park.
His association with Hall did not end with their years on Hamilton's run.
As a young married man, Ben and his wife continued to patronise his former supervisor. A later account remembered that "Benjamin Hall and his wife patronised his old Boyd friend for about twelve months" during the happier period before Hall's life began to unravel.
The relationship survived even Hall's descent into bushranging. In March 1865, during the final weeks of his life, Hall robbed Jones' store at Forbes. The episode presents one of the strange contradictions characteristic of Hall's later career: the former stockman, now hunted across the colony, confronting a man who had known him as a thirteen-year-old boy learning the pastoral trade. Hall would be dead only thirty-five days later.
The years spent working for Hugh Hamilton were therefore among the most formative of Ben Hall's life. Here he developed the extraordinary horsemanship for which he later became famous, learned the geography and rhythms of the Lachlan pastoral country, and formed relationships with men whose names would repeatedly intersect with his own.
Some, like William "Hoppy" Jones, remained friends.
Others, like Daniel Charters, would eventually become accomplices—and then witnesses against the gang.
At thirteen, however, none of that lay before him. Ben Hall had arrived in the Lachlan not as a bushranger but as a stockman's son looking for work. By every surviving indication, he was exceptionally well suited to it.
![]() |
| (1813-1888) |
Hall appears to have distinguished himself particularly through his understanding of livestock. His ability was not confined to exceptional horsemanship; contemporary recollections suggest that he possessed the stockman's instinctive ability to read the movement and temperament of animals. One later account associated him with the introduction of improved cattle into the district:
"The first man to bring pedigreed Short-horn cattle to the district. The man in charge of the cattle was Ben Hall; after bringing out Mr Hamilton's cattle, Hall was for years on the station as a stockman."
The responsibility is significant. Pedigreed Shorthorns represented valuable breeding stock, and entrusting their movement to Hall suggests that, despite his youth, Hamilton regarded him as a capable and dependable stockman. It also places Hall within the changing pastoral economy of the Lachlan, as graziers sought to improve the quality of their herds rather than relying solely upon the rougher cattle that had characterised the earlier frontier.
Hamilton's various holdings lay within roughly twenty-five miles of the emerging settlement at Black Ridge, later Forbes. For the teenage Hall, these years provided an intimate knowledge of the country that would become the centre of his adult life. The stations, stock routes, watercourses and ranges through which he worked as a young stockman were the same landscapes through which he would later move with remarkable confidence while pursued by police.
The Hall family itself was meanwhile beginning to establish new connections in the district. Ben's elder sister Mary married William Wright, a local stockman and former convict considerably older than herself. Through such marriages and working relationships, the Halls became increasingly embedded within the pastoral community of the Lachlan.
By the end of 1851 Benjamin Hall senior could see that his sons were capable of supporting themselves. They had found steady employment, developed valuable pastoral skills and established connections among local station owners and stockmen. His immediate purpose in bringing them to the Lachlan had therefore largely been accomplished.
Hall senior consequently decided to return to Murrurundi and rejoin Eliza and the children who had remained behind—Edward, Catherine, Robert, Henry and the youngest, Ellen.
For young Ben, the decision represented another significant separation. His father, who had brought him hundreds of miles from the Upper Hunter and introduced him to life on the Lachlan, now departed. Ben remained behind.
Still only fourteen years old, he was effectively beginning an independent working life.
The transition is important in understanding the man he later became. Hall was not raised into adulthood under close parental supervision. By his early teens he was earning his living among adult stockmen in an enormous pastoral district, entrusted with valuable animals and accustomed to travelling considerable distances on horseback. The independence, self-reliance and extraordinary familiarity with the Lachlan that later characterised the bushranger had been acquired years earlier through legitimate pastoral work.
At this point in his life, Ben Hall appears to have been succeeding. He had employment, respected ability with horses and cattle, and an expanding network of friends and acquaintances throughout the district. His father's criminal reputation had followed the family south, but there was as yet little indication that the fourteen-year-old stockman would eventually acquire a far greater notoriety of his own.
| 15th April 1843, Pages River Racing. Courtesy NLA. |
His affinity with horses, however, had developed long before his arrival there.
Horse racing had been an important feature of Hall's childhood at Murrurundi. His father owned several good horses and participated in the local racing culture that flourished around Haydonton. Racing in these frontier settlements was considerably removed from the formal racecourses of Sydney. Meetings were important social occasions, attracting landholders, stockmen, tradesmen and travellers from across the surrounding district.
The Haydon Family Papers preserve a vivid description of the old Murrurundi course. It began opposite the later school site, ran parallel with Mayne Street towards the vicinity of the Royal Hotel, then turned north across Little Street before circling back towards the starting point. Meetings were held frequently and attracted large fields, with races commonly decided through a series of heats.
Among the horses remembered from these early meetings were Dr Welsh's Death, Mr Butt's Snake, W. Wightman's Cannonball, Henry O'Neil's Wallaby, and horses belonging to the prominent Dangar and Single families. Benjamin Hall senior also entered his own horses, including Jacky Jacky and Roderick.
For young Ben, horses were therefore much more than working animals. From childhood he had watched them bred, trained, compared and raced. He learned to appreciate the qualities that distinguished an ordinary stock horse from an exceptional animal: conformation, stamina, temperament and speed. The excitement and prestige attached to possessing a fine horse made a lasting impression upon him.
That early fascination matured during his years on the Lachlan. Hall became an accomplished judge of horseflesh and retained a particular admiration for well-bred and fast horses throughout his life. In later years, when his circumstances improved, that interest would develop into ownership and racing of horses of his own. Even during his bushranging career, contemporary accounts repeatedly remarked upon the quality of the mounts associated with Hall and his companions.
His ability with livestock extended equally to cattle. Hall was remembered as quiet and reserved, more inclined to demonstrate his competence than advertise it. During mustering he displayed patience and confidence around difficult stock and developed the practical knowledge expected of an experienced cattleman. He could assess the condition of an animal at a glance and determine its approximate age by examining its teeth—an essential skill when buying, selling or sorting cattle on large pastoral runs.
Such abilities were particularly valuable in the unfenced country of the Lachlan, where cattle could scatter across enormous distances and mustering demanded both endurance and judgement. A good stockman needed to anticipate how a mob would react before it moved, recognise when an animal was likely to break away and know when pressure should be applied or relaxed. Hall appears to have possessed these instincts naturally.
His later reputation as one of the finest horsemen in the colony was therefore not created during his years as a bushranger. It was the product of a lifetime spent around horses: first as the son of a butcher, grazier and racing enthusiast at Murrurundi, and then as a teenage stockman learning his trade across the stations of the Lachlan.
Long before the police came to fear Ben Hall's ability to disappear across the countryside on horseback, pastoralists valued precisely the same skills.
![]() |
| Ernest & Adelaide |
Among those who knew him was Ernest Bowler, a prominent Lachlan squatter who frequently encountered Hall during mustering. Bowler remembered him as an exceptionally capable bushman whose services were welcomed whenever cattle or wild horses had to be gathered.
In Frederick Howard's The Moleskin Gentry, Bowler recalled:
"Ben Hall had a cattle station at Wheogo, and he used to attend all the musters round. He was one of the smart, devil-may-care bushmen, knew the whole country well, always had a good horse and knew how to ride. He was a good mate at mustering cattle or running wild horses."
Bowler particularly remembered Hall's extraordinary ability to identify livestock. During a large muster, cattle belonging to numerous owners might be brought together and held overnight before being separated according to their brands. Cows and calves inevitably became mixed among the mob, presenting stockmen with the difficult task of matching them again.
Hall possessed the ability known as "mothering" calves. Bowler claimed that after a day's muster Hall could identify which calf belonged to which cow even when animals carrying a hundred different brands had been gathered together.
It was a remarkable demonstration of visual memory and practical knowledge. Such a skill required hours of close observation and an ability to recognise subtle differences between individual animals. It helps explain why Hall's services were repeatedly sought by pastoralists throughout the district.
Bowler also remembered Hall personally.
Several years before Hall became a bushranger, Ernest was travelling by dog cart with his visiting sister Adelaide when they encountered Hall driving a wagon towards Wheogo. Bowler recognised him and stopped to exchange greetings. After the two men had spoken and continued on their respective journeys, Adelaide remarked:
"What a good-looking man that was."
Her brother replied:
"Yes, and a fine fellow he is, too. He has a place at Wheogo near Grenfell. His name is Ben Hall."
The recollection is valuable precisely because nothing remarkable was happening. Hall was not yet an outlaw and Bowler had no reason to romanticise an encounter with a notorious bushranger. He was simply a neighbouring grazier and stockman whom Bowler regarded as competent and respectable.
Other residents remembered him similarly.
Elizabeth Farrand, later Ernest Bowler's wife, arrived in Forbes with her family in 1857. Her father, William Farrand, became a prominent local magistrate and was associated with the Lachlan Observer. Elizabeth's later relationship with Hall's memory was considerably more complicated than Ernest's.
As a girl she encountered Hall under very different circumstances during his bushranging years. At Yamma Station she and others were detained by Hall's gang, while her father was threatened with a flogging. Yet despite the frightening circumstances of that encounter, Elizabeth's recollections of Hall remained surprisingly favourable. In later life she repeatedly referred to him as "the good-looking young man" and remembered his earlier reputation in the district with evident interest.
Her description of the young stockman closely corresponded with that of her future husband:
"Mrs. Bowler describes him as being a well-built, good looking young man with a pleasant disposition which gained him the friendship of all with whom he came in contact. A splendid rider and a good stockman, his services were frequently in demand."
These recollections should not be mistaken for evidence that Hall possessed an uniformly gentle character. They were recorded many years after the events, when the mythology surrounding the bushranger was already well established. Nevertheless, their consistency with accounts from people who knew Hall before his outlawry makes them significant.
A somewhat different portrait emerged from other old residents.
When the Freeman's Journal published reminiscences of the bushranging era in 1930, Hall was remembered as possessing "a certain detachment and shyness." The description suggests that the easy confidence displayed on horseback did not necessarily extend to every aspect of his personality. He could apparently be reserved and self-contained, qualities that accord with other recollections of a man who tended to demonstrate his abilities rather than advertise them.
Thomas Bates, remembering Hall many decades later, provided another dimension. He recalled that Ben "could spin a good yarn and sing a song in the rough, boisterous fashion of the day." The shy stockman was therefore not socially withdrawn. Among people he knew, he could participate readily in the convivial culture of the pastoral frontier.
Taken together, these recollections provide a surprisingly coherent picture.
Hall was remembered as physically attractive, exceptionally capable on horseback, observant with livestock and confident in the bush. He could be quiet and somewhat detached, yet among companions he was capable of humour, storytelling and song. Most importantly, he appears to have enjoyed a broad circle of acquaintances extending across an enormous area of the Central West.
"An amiable sincerity of soul, a generosity of spirit, and an honesty in all his dealings with his fellow-settlers that won their friendliest esteem. He was steady, industrious, temperate, keenly intelligent, and, above all, always ready to give a helping hand to a neighbour."
Such retrospective descriptions must inevitably be treated with some caution, particularly after Hall's transformation into a legendary figure. Nevertheless, they accord with other recollections of his early life. Before the events that made his name notorious, Hall appears to have been regarded throughout the Lachlan as an industrious and capable young stockman with considerable prospects.
Hugh Hamilton evidently recognised those qualities.
Jack Bradshaw, writing many decades later in Frank Gardiner, Ben Hall & Gang, claimed that Hamilton became particularly fond of the young man after recognising his exceptional ability with stock. Bradshaw's account relied substantially upon information supplied by Hall's elder brother William and therefore provides an important family recollection, although one recorded long after the events.
According to Bradshaw:
"Mr Hamilton grew very fond of young Ben, finding out he possessed great ability as a stockman. Mr Hamilton gave Ben permission to graze horses and cattle on his station, which young Ben did, and purchased out of his salary in about three years a small station. He became full manager for Mr Hamilton. The seasons were good and the grass plentiful, so that young Ben became fairly rich."
The precise chronology of Hall's advancement is difficult to establish, but the broader picture is consistent with what is known of his early adulthood. Hall was earning wages while still in his teens, investing in livestock of his own and taking advantage of access to grazing country. Rather than drifting towards criminality, he appears during these years to have been moving steadily towards independence as a small pastoralist.
Life as a stockman was nevertheless demanding. Hall's duties would have included mustering, droving, branding and castrating cattle, breaking horses and protecting livestock from dingoes and other threats. Days commonly began around sunrise and continued until the work was completed, often well into the evening.
The ordinary rhythm of station life was punctuated by the great musters.
Several times each year men converged upon the principal stations from distant parts of the runs. Stockmen from neighbouring properties often joined them, and temporary yards were erected to handle the enormous mobs assembled from the surrounding country. The work meant long hours in the saddle, days spent away from the homestead and nights sleeping beneath the stars in blankets and swags.
For young men such as Hall, however, the muster was more than work. It was also an arena in which horsemanship, courage and reputation were tested before one's peers.
Few activities demonstrated those qualities more dramatically than running the wild horses known as warrigals.
Large mobs roamed the western stations, sometimes becoming serious pests by competing with domestic stock for pasture. At other times valuable broken horses escaped and joined them. Capturing a mob required riders capable of pursuing horses at speed through scrub and broken country, maintaining their bearings while anticipating how the mob would turn.
A retrospective account published by the Sydney Morning Herald in 1914 described the qualities demanded of such men. The successful stockman was an "active, game fellow" and "a first-class horseman," possessing what contemporaries called the "bump of locality"—an exceptional instinct for direction that enabled him to negotiate complicated bush country without becoming lost.
Hall possessed precisely those qualities.
Running warrigals could involve miles of hard riding. Stockmen sometimes used quiet horses as "trailers" to draw the wild mob towards yards, while a stallion could prove especially useful in holding the horses together. Once the chase began, however, success depended upon courage, judgement and exceptional riding.
There was also money to be made.
Ray Saint Smith later recalled that captured wild horses, once broken and brought under control, could command prices of £15 to £20 each—a substantial return beyond the ordinary wages of a station hand. For young stockmen, the chase therefore combined sport, prestige and financial opportunity.
Hall excelled in this environment. His easy manner and exceptional riding made him a conspicuous figure during the great musters, while his ability to negotiate difficult country at speed became part of his reputation. The same skills that later allowed him to elude mounted police had been developed years earlier in legitimate competition with cattle and wild horses.
The dangers were equally real.
In about 1853, when Hall was approximately sixteen years old, he suffered a serious accident while attempting to handle a spirited horse named Slasher, remembered as a racehorse on the local bush circuits. The horse suddenly lashed out, catching Hall and throwing him heavily. His leg was badly fractured.
The injury was severe enough to leave a permanent mark. Although Hall recovered sufficiently to resume the demanding life of a stockman and remained an outstanding horseman, he was thereafter said to carry a noticeable limp.
An account of the accident was later supplied by John Maguire, who would become Hall's brother-in-law, and preserved by P. H. Pinkstone in The Biography of a Reliable Old Native. Pinkstone compiled the work from a series of interviews and conversations with Maguire in the early twentieth century, giving the episode particular value as the recollection of a man closely connected with Hall and the district, although recorded more than half a century after the event.
The accident did little to diminish Hall's enthusiasm for horses. If anything, his subsequent life demonstrates the opposite. Racing, breeding, breaking and judging horses remained among his strongest interests. Good horses represented livelihood, status and freedom in the pastoral society in which he had grown to adulthood.
By his late teens, therefore, Hall's prospects appeared remarkably favourable. He was an accomplished stockman, an exceptional rider, increasingly trusted with responsibility and beginning to accumulate livestock of his own. He was well known across the district and remembered as industrious, temperate and willing to assist his neighbours.
Nothing about this period suggests a young man inevitably progressing towards bushranging.
On the contrary, the surviving recollections portray someone moving successfully in the opposite direction—from teenage station hand towards independent pastoralist. Understanding that success is essential to understanding the tragedy of what followed. Ben Hall did not become notorious because respectable colonial society had never offered him a place within it.
For a time, he had already made one.
Following the accident, the severely injured young stockman was transported by wagon to the nearby Bundaburra station, where Mrs. Mary Strickland tended to his fractured leg with the assistance of her brother, Tom Higgins. Higgins, the owner of the Forbes Dog and Duck Hotel, was a steadfast ally and close friend of Ben Hall. His doctoring in Hall’s recovery proved invaluable. In his memoirs, John Maguire noted that Higgins was one of the few people who would stand by Hall throughout his bushranging outbreak, ensuring he received support while on the road. Tom Higgins was also well acquainted with Frank Gardiner and was a respected horse trainer in the district.
![]() |
| Mary Coneley nee Strickland c. 1862. |
Mary later married Michael Coneley, a stockman from Bundaburra, who would later betray Ben Hall. The Strickland family is said to have disapproved of the marriage, viewing Coneley as merely an employee. While some sources claim Coneley passed away in 1895, this remains unverified, as no official death records for a Michael Coneley have been found.
Long after Ben Hall’s demise, his grave was reportedly tended to with great care for decades. On August 5, 1911, The Wingham Chronicle and Manning River Observer speculated that a local woman had maintained it.
While some believe this caretaker may have been Mary Strickland, who passed away in 1913 at her children’s home in Redfern, others suggest it may have been Anne Hall, Hall’s sister-in-law, who is known to have travelled from Parkes. Alternatively, the identity of the woman who cared for Hall’s grave may forever remain unknown, lost to time but bound by a lingering affection for the fallen bushranger.
Furthermore, on the day of Ben Hall’s death, a heartbroken Mary is said to have cut a lock of his hair as a keepsake. As his bloodied body lay beneath a coat, strapped to a horse near her home at Billabong Creek, she took this final memento—perhaps as a symbol of the deep bond they once shared.
Like many women living on remote properties, Mary was an accomplished horsewoman. In her younger years, she frequently competed in race meetings at Forbes, where substantial bets were often placed on her races. Her skill in the saddle was well known, further cementing her reputation in a community where horsemanship was a mark of both status and survival.
'The Forbes Advocate' Friday 23 September 1921:In 1855, after spending four years working for Hugh Hamilton, Ben Hall made a significant change in his life. He left his position and took up a new role as a stockman at Weeogo Station (also known as Uoka), a 16,000-acre property owned by John Walsh, an emancipated convict. However, this move was motivated by more than just career advancement—it was also driven by matters of the heart.
![]() |
St Michael's Catholic
Church, Bathurst.
c. 1850's. |
His time at Weeogo Station not only gave Hall newfound independence and professional growth but also deepened his relationship with Bridget. Their blossoming romance ultimately led to marriage, marking a major milestone in his life. After years of hard work under various station owners, Weeogo offered Hall a real opportunity for independence and the dream of one day owning his own station.
| The very same Alter at St Michael's Catholic Church, Bathurst where Ben and Biddy exchanged their vows in 1856. My Photo. |
Decades later, in February 1917, the Grenfell Record and Lachlan District Advertiser published a nostalgic account from a pioneer who fondly recalled the joyful day when Ben and Bridget journeyed to be married, a moment that would shape the course of Hall’s life in ways he could never have foreseen.
| John Walsh's Uoka (Weeoga) Station, registered under The Squatters Act-1846-47. Note; John Tait's station Oma. |
![]() |
| The Charters' former home, now Fern Hill. c. 1970's. Reputed birthplace of Henry Hall. Courtesy, Carcoar Historical Society. |
Three years into their marriage, Ben and Bridget Hall welcomed their only child, a son named Henry, on 7th August 1859. He was born at the home of Ben Hall’s friend, Daniel Charters’ mother, in Carcoar. There was later speculation that the couple may have had another child before Henry—one who either passed away, was stillborn, or resulted from a miscarriage. John Maguire later noted in his account, "There had been two children, but the first had died." This tragedy may have been an early sign of trouble in the marriage.
Despite becoming a father, Ben Hall was known to associate with some of the more dubious figures in a district notorious for its shady residents. His close ties with Daniel Charters, in particular, would soon draw legal attention to both men.
In late 1859, Hall and Charters were summoned to appear at the Burrowa Court over an unsettled loan concerning a horse Charters had borrowed. The complaint was filed by John Healy, a known troublemaker and acquaintance of both men. Although Hall was called as a witness in Charters’ defense, he ultimately did not have to testify. To further shield Hall from any legal repercussions, Charters explicitly stated in court that Ben had no involvement in the matter, despite having been present when the horse was acquired.
![]() |
| John Maguire Sandy Creek Station. Gazette, 15th February 1861. |
![]() |
| Sandy Creek c. 1883. Courtesy David Geelings. |
| Maguire and Hall's Sandy Creek Station still recorded as owners in Bailliere's New South Wales Gazetteer, 1866. Note acreage. |
The establishment of Sandy Creek Station and the transition from Wheogo Homestead suggest that land clearing and construction began around 1858–1859, preceding the official lease granted in 1860. During this period, Ben Hall, alongside his older brothers Thomas Wade and William Hall, and his close friend Daniel Charters, worked to build a home for Ben, his wife Bridget, and their infant son Henry. The men likely also assisted John Maguire in constructing his residence.
During this time, William Hall and his wife Ann resided with Ben and Bridget at Sandy Creek. While it is unclear whether the cohabitation initially caused tensions, conflicts between William and Bridget did emerge. After Ben’s death, Ann Hall openly blamed Bridget for the tragedy, reportedly stating, “He wouldn’t be lying there if not for his wife’s actions,” hinting at long-standing strains in their relationship.
![]() |
| William and Ann Hall. c. 1910. Penzig. |
As a spirited Weddin girl, Bridget may have struggled with domestic life, often taking absences from Sandy Creek for several days at a time, sometimes accompanied by her sister, Catherine “Kitty” Brown. These excursions, initially seen as social visits to neighboring stations, masked an unfolding domestic crisis. Bridget had begun secretly meeting her new romantic interest, James Taylor, while Kitty was engaged in a passionate affair with the notorious bushranger Frank Gardiner—an entanglement that added another layer of intrigue to the turmoil.
During Bridget’s absences, Ann Hall cared for her children, Mary and John, born in 1858 and 1860, respectively, and took on the responsibility of caring for young Henry. This bond between Ann and Henry endured well into adulthood, as he later spent periods living with William and Ann in Parkes, New South Wales, indicating a lasting familial connection despite the fractures that had formed with Bridget during those years at Sandy Creek.
Note: It should also be noted that John Maguire also used the spelling of McGuire with an A, i.e., MaGuire, Maguire as demonstrated on Ben Hall's marriage certificate. However, for the purposes of this bio, I have used Maguire
| John Wilson freehold portion of Sandy Creek. Granted 1868. Courtesy Peter Bradley. |
Although no documented records exist of Ben Hall’s reaction to the legal troubles his father and brothers faced, his life as a young cattleman and horseman changed dramatically with the discovery of gold near Forbes, close to his station.
The allure of this precious metal sparked a global frenzy, drawing fortune seekers from all corners of the world. Entire communities uprooted as thousands rushed to the burgeoning goldfields of New South Wales, particularly Lambing Flat and the newly proclaimed Eldorado of Forbes. Amid this feverish migration, John Maguire, Hall’s brother-in-law and business partner, capitalised on establishing a gold mine at the Pinnacle Range, five miles from his homestead further intertwining their fortunes with the rapidly evolving landscape of the colony.
The significant gold discovery at Burrangong in 1860 (later known as Lambing Flat and today as Young) ignited widespread excitement, drawing a flood of prospectors into the Lachlan district. Soon after, another gold discovery and rush transformed the once-sleepy backwater town of Forbes, formerly known as Black Ridge, into a thriving and prosperous gold mining hub.
The dramatic growth of Forbes following the gold discovery was widely reported in contemporary newspapers, with accounts detailing how the influx of fortune seekers rapidly reshaped the settlement into one of the colony’s most important mining centres. A discovery where the enterprising cattlemen soon had an Eldorado at their feet. How beef.
The Forbes Advocate Friday 7 Oct 1921 Page 2 - OLD FORBES.
The town of Forbes experienced rapid growth with the influx of gold seekers. The discovery not only attracted merchants, hoteliers, carpenters, entertainers, and butchers—eager to profit from the swelling population—but also drew less reputable figures. Among them were criminals and opportunists who preyed on travellers, waylaying them at gunpoint, and those who, after failing as miners, turned to theft even murder. Many of these eventually embraced the life of bushrangers.
![]() |
| Mr. George Ranken |
The term bushranger originally referred to escaped convicts who, rebelling against the brutal conditions of the chain gangs, survived by robbing isolated settlers—often facing execution if recaptured. However, as the goldfields expanded, the definition broadened to include any hardened criminal engaged in similar activities. Their notoriety was punctuated by infamous commands such as "Bail up!", "Stand and deliver!", or the chilling ultimatum, "Your money or your life."
Amid this shifting and often dangerous landscape, Ben Hall successfully established a prosperous cattle station at Sandy Creek, ideally positioned to supply beef to the growing demand from the two nearby goldfields. Lambing Flat 60 miles and Forbes 25 miles.
The dramatic transformation and newfound prosperity of Forbes following the gold rush were vividly detailed in a late 1861 newspaper article, capturing the rapid rise of the town and the challenges that came with it.
We never saw a place of the same age in such a state of forwardness as this. Several good streets give an appearance of regularity to the rows of calico and bark, and the existence of an unlimited supply of excellent pine timber close at hand has led to the erection of buildings much more substantial, and sightly than those we have been accustomed to see in other new townships. A bi-weekly Court of Petty Sessions has already been established; of amusements, we have no lack of music and dancing, while billiard tables, a rifle gallery, and ten pins seem as popular as ever. The banking and gold buying business, of the "Oriental", and also of the post office are transacted at the stores of Mr Greig. Mrs Reed has a photographic gallery. Coaches ply frequently during the day between the crossing place at Fenn’s. (Wowingragong) and also these diggings a distance of nearly five miles. The Cowra coaches and mails from Sydney and the Flat run three times a week. Thus it will be seen that Forbes is not a place to be lightly esteemed.¹⁷
During this period, he became acquainted with a group of men who would soon be infamous as the Wild Colonial Boys—a rough and restless crowd, who stepped outside the law, armed with revolvers. Though Hall remained committed to his cattle station, he unknowingly found himself drawn into the orbit of men whose activities would soon turn his property into a focal point for bushranging in the district and a focal point of the police and one Sir Frederick Pottinger.
![]() |
| Francis Christie, alias Francis Clarke, Frank Gardiner. c. 1862. |
In reality, Frank Gardiner was a pseudonym for Francis Christie, born in Scotland in 1829. He arrived in New South Wales with his parents in 1834 at the age of five, and with his family soon after settled in what would become Victoria. However, as Christie entered adulthood, he found himself on the wrong side of the law.
Convicted of horse stealing in Victoria, he was sentenced to five years at Pentridge Stockade in Coburg, Melbourne. Yet, after serving only a year, he managed a daring escape and fled to New South Wales in late 1851 (for more details, see Gardiner page).
In NSW, operating under the aliases Gardiner and Clarke, he resumed his criminal activities. His freedom was short-lived, however, as he was arrested for horse theft in Yass in February 1854. Found guilty under the name Clarke, he was sentenced to fourteen years—two consecutive seven-year terms—to be served at the infamous Cockatoo Island prison in Sydney, a penal stronghold known for its brutal conditions.
![]() |
| Gardiner Ticket-of-Leave 1859. Never before published. |
However, growing suspicions of cattle theft forced Gardiner and Fogg to make a sudden exit from Lambing Flat, retreating to the familiar territory of the Fish River (Lachlan River) district. Gardiner sought refuge at Fogg’s residence, but word of his presence soon reached the authorities. In an attempt to apprehend him, police officers Middleton and Hosie confronted Gardiner, triggering a violent clash. A gunfight and brutal brawl ensued, leaving both officers severely wounded while Gardiner himself was viciously beaten. Yet, under suspicious circumstances, he managed to escape.
Now a fugitive once again, Gardiner resurfaced in Wheogo, aided by his growing association with John Gilbert and John O’Meally, who were involved in cattle theft operations in Young (formerly Lambing Flat) on Gardiner's behalf. However, his return in the district was marked by more than just criminal enterprise—it also introduced scandal.
Gardiner became entangled in a passionate affair with Catherine Brown, the 18-year-old wife of John Brown and the younger sister of Bridget Hall. Catherine and her husband lived in a small hut not far from the Wheogo homestead, where Ben and Bridget formally resided. Despite being 14 years her senior, Gardiner’s relationship with Catherine was intense and illicit, further complicating the web of alliances and betrayals that would soon define the Wheogo district.
![]() |
| Sir Frederick Pottinger. c. 1863. |
Pottinger’s arrival in the colony in 1859 was shrouded in mystery. After failing in his endeavours at the Victorian goldfields, he made his way to New South Wales and joined the police force as a mounted trooper in the southern gold escort at Gundagai. It was during this time that his aristocratic status—previously undisclosed—was inadvertently, or perhaps deliberately, revealed. Once his true lineage as a baronet became known, Pottinger swiftly ascended the ranks of government service.
His rapid rise saw him first appointed as Clerk of Petty Sessions at Dubbo, followed by a magistrate’s role during the Lambing Flat riots in 1861, which were fueled by tensions between European and Chinese miners. Eventually, under the newly enacted Police Act of 1862, Pottinger secured the prestigious position of Police Inspector in charge of the Lachlan District, with headquarters in Forbes.
Pottinger’s primary mission was clear: capture the elusive Frank Gardiner. For weeks, he led extensive bush searches through the Wheogo and Bland districts, working alongside other prominent bushranger hunters, including Captain Battye and Captain Zouch. However, his efforts were met with resistance. Many local landowners and grog shop traders harbored deep resentment toward the police, which allowed Gardiner to find refuge among certain sympathisers.
One of Gardiner’s key allies was Mrs. Feehiley, the owner of the infamous Pinnacle Station and the sister of Daniel Charters. Pottinger, increasingly suspicious of the district’s graziers, turned his scrutiny toward Ben Hall and John Maguire’s station, believing they, too, might be complicit in aiding bushrangers.
![]() |
| Kitty's reputed hut, Wheogo Station. c. 1920's. Courtesy Gordon Piper. |
Dedicated to his spiritual duties of guidance and redemption, the clergyman reproached them for engaging in labor on the Sabbath, urging them to reflect on the sanctity of the day. His rebuke, though well-intended, was met with little concern from the men—both of whom, by then, were becoming increasingly entangled in a life far removed from religious observance.
![]() |
| Bridget Hall c. 1919. Note Taylors Wedding ring. Private Source. Never before published. |
Despite their age difference, Taylor captivated the young Bridget. While it was believed that she had no prior acquaintance with him before marrying Ben Hall, evidence suggests otherwise. Social interactions among settlers in isolated districts were common, with long horseback rides to visit neighbours, attend social gatherings, and even stay over for days being an accepted part of bush life.
The Weddin Mountains and Bland district were tight-knit communities, where family connections were often cemented through intermarriage. Bridget’s link to Taylor can be traced through Taylor’s former wife, Emma (née Dower), and her sister Mary Jamieson, whose family owned land at Back Creek close to Bridget’s father’s station at Wheogo.
Taylor’s family, meanwhile, held significant landholdings, including Balabla and The Rocks, near Bimbi—strategically located close to key properties such as Arramagong Station, home to the O’Meally family and the raising gold fields. This network of connections further blurred the lines between Bridget Hall’s personal ties and the growing influence of bushranger activity in the district. All these stations were within 15 miles of Lambing Flat.
![]() |
| William Fogg and Mary Fogg, nee Taylor. c. 1870's Penzig |
The close bond between Fogg and Gardiner was evident in the actions of Mary Fogg. She proudly showcased to visitors a symbol of victory against authority—a shredded and bloodied shirt belonging to Gardiner, that survived during his bloody encounter with troopers Middleton and Hosie in 1861. It was this turn of events that brought Gardiner to the Lachlan and Kitty Brown. However, this memento held great sentimental value for Mary Fogg, representing defiance and triumph over the forces of law and order. The 'Empire' newspaper on Saturday, 14th March 1863, reported on this display by Mary Fogg.
With Kitty in the arms of Gardiner Bridget Hall commenced her relationship with James Taylor. However, he was still legally married, having wed Emma Dower in 1849 in Yass, New South Wales. At the time their affair began, Taylor had recently left Emma, who was struggling with alcoholism, at their home in Bennetts Springs, Narrawa near Crookwell, NSW. He abandoned her leaving Emma to care for their their older children—Sophie (born 1851), Mary (born 1858), and baby John (born 1859).
Note: Many sources mistakenly link James Taylor to the NSW Police, though this is inaccurate. The confusion likely arises from his father, a former convict who, upon release, briefly served in the constabulary at Penrith before settling at Balabla.
By the latter half of 1861, Taylor’s relationship with Bridget Hall had intensified following his return to the Lachlan district. However, Taylor—like his estranged wife Emma—battled alcoholism, a struggle that would ultimately contribute to his demise in 1877. Bridget and Taylor would produce three children Catherine b. 1869 John b. 1870, James b. 1871. James appears to be initially registered as Jameison.
At first, Taylor framed his visits to Ben Hall’s station as friendly gestures. However, it soon became evident that his true motive lay in his growing romantic interest in Bridget, a contrast to Ben’s more reserved and quiet nature.
Sensing trouble, John Maguire, Ben Hall’s business partner at Sandy Creek Station, privately confided in Ben about the suspicious nature of Bridget’s relationship with Taylor. His concerns were later documented in The Biography of a Reliable Old Native, where he revealed...
In the early spring of 1861, as Ben Hall prepared to depart Sandy Creek for the annual cattle muster, he shared a tender farewell with Bridget and playfully tousled the hair of his young son, Henry, unaware that this would be their last goodbye. Casting a final affectionate look at his cara sposa (beloved wife), Hall mounted his horse and rode off to join fellow squatters in the arduous task of rounding up both branded and unbranded cattle, as well as wild horses, across the vast Bland and Lachlan plains.
These mustering events were crucial gatherings, bringing together squatters of all ranks. The crisp spring mornings would slowly give way to lengthening days, as men rode across the sprawling landscape, driving stock and sharing news of the district.
The significance of these musters in the lives of squatters was vividly described by Clarence Paget Bayly:
Upon Hall's return from mustering, he was confronted with the devastating reality that Jim Taylor had whisked away his young wife Bridget. Not only that, but they had also taken Hall's beloved son Henry, the sunshine of his home, with them. The couple had eloped and sought refuge in Bigga, a location roughly 80 miles away from Hall's station. John Maguire described Ben Hall's emotional state as:
The veracity of the letter allegedly left by Bridget is uncertain. If it did exist, it was likely composed by Bridget’s literate older sister, Elen Maguire, given that Bridget herself could not write, as evidenced by their marriage certificate where both she and Ben signed with an "X". Elen, who remained close to Ben Hall until his death, was fully aware of Taylor’s feelings for Bridget and eventually disclosed the affair to her husband, John Maguire.
In the aftermath of Bridget’s departure and his unsuccessful attempts to locate his son Henry, reports suggest that Ben Hall was deeply affected by the loss, as his son was the sunshine of his home. Furthermore, the discovery of Taylor's betrayal is said to have ignited a fierce anger in Ben, fuelling a desire for violent retribution against the man who had usurped his home. John Maguire noted this profound shift in Ben's temperament, observing a darker, more vengeful side emerging.
![]() |
MacAlister's former
Great Eastern Hotel, Forbes, frequented by Ben Hall. c. 1862. N.L.A. |
MacAlister also highlighted how disguising one's identity was a common tactic during robberies, a strategy that Hall might have used in his initial criminal endeavours with 'the boys'. This could have included blackening his face or donning a crape or calico mask to hide his identity.
While some historians question the extent of Hall's early bushranging ties, the accounts from contemporaries like MacAlister provide strong evidence of his involvement. These are not mere conjectures but are based on direct observations and experiences. MacAlister’s writings are particularly insightful for understanding Hall’s early collaboration with Gardiner and his gang, as revealed through thorough research.
![]() |
Illustration of hotel
festivities on the Gold Fields. c. 1860's. Image courtesy NLA. |
Ben Hall's loss of interest in Sandy Creek station became apparent when he was frequently spotted in the bustling township of Forbes, often in the company of individuals associated with Gardiner's gang. These meetings, detailed in Charles MacAlister's memoirs, typically unfolded in the vibrant settings of hotels and dance halls, where bushrangers mixed with locals over drinks, entertainment, and revelry. Uncaring of the police presence.
A notable distraction for Hall during these times was the presence of the Hurdy-Gurdy Girls, who danced with stockmen and miners for money, providing rare social interaction in a community where female company was scarce. Taking advantage of the gold-rich patrons and their often inebriated state, some dancers charged steep prices for a dance some in the vicinity of five pounds. The lively backdrop was set by musicians playing robustly to cover the sound of stomping feet, while poignant ballads about distant homes stirred a mix of nostalgia and longing among the miners.
Charles MacAlister recounted how these social gatherings frequently devolved into violent fistfights, with bushrangers like Gilbert indulging in various misdeeds. The NSW police struggled to control the chaos, often finding themselves outmatched and unable to catch the culprits behind the tumultuous brawls. Even the barmaids were subject to the rowdy advances of the exuberant men, adding to the tumultuous atmosphere of these events.
Another former old-hand recalled life in the new sin city of Forbes; 'Western Herald', October 1908:
In an article for the 'Freeman's Journal' dated November 10, 1906, the noted 1860s journalist Dan Mayne a close friend of Sir Frederick Pottinger, vividly described the bustling atmosphere of Forbes during the time of Ben Hall's infamy. Mayne painted a picture of the town's carefree spirit, highlighting how men casually tossed and scattered gold nuggets, adding to the excitement and joviality that pervaded the environment. The nights were filled with robust singing, energetic dancing, and plentiful drinks, while the charming presence of Forbes' women further enlivened the already vibrant streets. Ben Hall continued to be a familiar figure in this lively scene, moving from one spot to another, fully immersed in the town’s nightlife.
Every entrepreneur was vying for the patronage of the cashed-up prospectors, graziers and station hands. A Forbes theatre advertisement 1862:
![]() |
| Gold Warden Captain Brown. Courtesy HHS. |
Ben Hall immersed himself in the vibrant life of Forbes, frequently joining Gilbert, O'Meally, and their cohorts for nights of revelry. They patronised the many public houses in Forbes, where an abundance of wine, spirits, women, and song created a lively atmosphere. Notable establishments like Montgomery's Rising Sun Hotel, Great Eastern, and Cohen's Inn were among the numerous venues that dotted the town, while Hall also spent time at the Harp of Erin Inn and The White Hart Inn, managed by John Wilson, a friend of Maguire.
For a time, Hall cohabited with a woman reputedly named Betsy, (Penzig) though their relationship was brief as she eventually left with another. Moreover, Forbes was known for its Sly Grog shops—clandestine drinking spots that attracted dubious figures. One notorious shop was run by Gilbert and O'Meally, located along the road from Lambing Flat to Forbes, on the Gold highway near the Weddin Mountains. Highlighted below:
Yass Courier 22nd June 1861
These sly grog shops were not only places for cheaper drinks compared to the more upscale dance halls and hotels, but they also functioned as hubs for gathering information, planning highway robberies, and fencing stolen goods. Attracting a clientele that often included gangs and individuals looking to avoid police attention, these establishments were a favourite among those operating on the fringes of the law. Located on the edges of the goldfields, saloons hosting bare-knuckle boxing matches for wagers were particularly popular with this crowd. Intriguingly, despite frequent raids by law enforcement, many of these clandestine hotels and drinking spots were run by women, who managed to navigate and survive the challenges posed by the authorities.
Long after the gold rush had faded, and recounting the heady days of life in Forbes, an old resident mused over the throngs of people parading the streets circa 1862. 'The Forbes Advocate', Wednesday 4th April 1928:
Bridget, known for her fiery temperament as one of the wild Weddin Girls, used her sharp tongue as a weapon, unleashing a torrent of verbal abuse at Elizabeth Fitkin. The explicit language exchanged between them shocked those who overheard it. The barman of the hotel, Mr. Murray, was so taken aback by the vitriol of their exchange that he failed to appear as a witness when summoned to court, resulting in him being held in contempt. Eventually, Murray was escorted into the courtroom by a policeman. When questioned about his reluctance, Murray candidly explained to the judge.
![]() | ||
| Bridget Taylor |
On this particular occasion, the elder Hall was viciously assaulted by an individual believed to be known to him. This attack happened while he was on his way home after spending a peaceful evening at Thomas Abbott's Plough Inn at Blandford. The story was covered extensively in the January 8, 1862, issue of 'The Newcastle Chronicle and Hunter River District News.'
![]() |
| Flamboyant, Claude Du Val. by William Powell Firth (1819-1909) |
This approach was similarly embraced by his cohort, John Gilbert, who also presented himself with flamboyance. Even the more reserved Ben Hall, who took great pride in his appearance, started to adopt this style. This trend among the trio—Gilbert, O'Meally, and Hall—made them stand out; despite their criminal activities, they were often noted for their cleanliness, sharp dress, and composed demeanour. As they carried out their bold raids across the Lachlan region, these bushrangers maintained a dignified presence, their outlaw behaviour contrasting starkly with their refined exteriors. This combination blurred the lines between villainy and respectability, crafting an enthralling image that captivated the public’s attention.
These actions, as unconventional as they may seem for outlaws, only served to enhance Gardiner and Hall's prestige. They were not just mere thieves but held a certain code, a chivalry of sorts, within their lawlessness. This intriguing facet of their characters further cemented their reputations, presenting a compelling contrast to the ruthless bushranger image, thereby keeping the public perpetually captivated.
Adopting the egalitarian ideals promoted by Frank Gardiner, John Gilbert, O'Meally, and Ben Hall forged their own distinct path in their outlaw activities. Hall's recent alliance with Frank Gardiner, reinforced by his established friendship with John O'Meally and John Gilbert, shifted him from his life as a grazier into the thrilling realm of bushranging. This transition into a life of defiance and daring inevitably set him on a collision course with the forces of law.
Sir Frederick Pottinger, a determined law enforcement officer, had already targeted the infamous Frank Gardiner and his gang. When several highway robberies occurred near Sandy Creek from March to April 1862, one attributed to Ben Hall, his arrest was notably public and dramatic. Hall was apprehended at the Forbes racecourse, handcuffed, and taken to the lock-up.
The arrest created a significant commotion among the local population, many of whom were stunned to see one of their own detained so publicly. Despite Gardiner’s well-known status as the dominant 'King of the Road,' the notion that Hall might be complicit was startling and left many in disbelief. With Gardiner reputed to control local travel routes—allegedly issuing free passes for unobstructed travel—the lines between criminal and hero in Hall’s public persona became increasingly blurred, complicating how he was viewed throughout the district.
As Ben Hall delved deeper into the bushranging life, he found himself amidst a diverse and transient group that frequented the rough sly grog shops and shanties scattered around the goldfields. These men, drawn by Frank Gardiner’s charismatic leadership, would often loiter like dingos, waiting for chances to profit from Gardiner's bold schemes. Notable among this group were figures such as John Davis, John McGuinness, 'Paddy' Connolly, and 15-year-old Johnny Walsh — Bridget Hall's brother — along with John Jameison, Taylor's nephew, all of whom were well-acquainted with Ben.
Gardiner's gang was a diverse assembly, constantly changing as various individuals, often down on their luck, joined and departed from the ranks of these bushrangers. Gardiner’s readiness to confront any passerby with his pistol became legendary. His daring actions were so significant that they were even debated in the New South Wales 'Parliamentary Hansard' and reported in the 'Sydney Morning Herald' on August 19th, 1863, for the period from March 1862 to April 1862, showcasing the broad intrigue and, in some quarters, admiration for Gardiner’s reckless endeavours.
Undoubtedly, the relationships Ben Hall had formed, coupled with his recent forays into highway robbery, likely tied him to several reported incidents, especially the last three above. It's important to note that there could be a delay of several weeks between the dates of the robberies and when they were published.
Ben Hall's ties to Frank Gardiner trace back to around late 1860. This connection was further confirmed by a mail contract rider who was held up in Binalong in 1863 by Hall and John Gilbert. The postman's testimony further cemented the partnership between these infamous bushrangers, highlighting the complex network of associations that underpinned their criminal endeavours. This was documented in the 'Geelong Advertiser' in December 1863.
![]() |
| Ben Hall description NSW Police Gazette, for 8th April 1862, Note Lame. Others no doubt 1. Gardiner, 3. Gilbert and 4. O'Meally. |
However, there is little doubt that Ben Hall had already been involved in earlier robberies with Gardiner’s gang. Through a combination of luck, discretion, and cunning, he had managed to evade identification in the many crimes carried out by Gardiner, Gilbert, and the O'Meally brothers, John and Patrick.
The notion of Hall’s innocence in criminal activity is further discredited by Charles MacAlister, publican and builder of the Great Eastern Hotel in Forbes. MacAlister’s recollections in 'Old Pioneering Days in the Sunny South,' confirm that Hall was deeply entangled with Gardiner’s notorious associates. Though his early misdeeds initially escaped prosecution—often through failure of the authorities coupled with strategic denials or lack of evidence—Ben Hall had already stepped beyond the boundaries of the law. His descent into outright criminality was now inevitable.
![]() |
| Ben Hall woodcut image, c. 1865. Courtesy NLA. |
In an April 1862 edition of the NSW Police Gazette, promulgated three months before the Eugowra Escort Robbery of June 1862. Hall noted in the publication regarding his participation in unlawful acts. The entire Lambing Flat/Forbes district was grappling with rampant lawlessness, and Hall through local observation was deeply involved in the havoc of robbery and fear to the hundreds of victims, many which failed to report their bailing up.
The leap into Bushranging; "Next time they take me, they'll have something to take me for."
![]() |
| Forbes Annual Horse Racing results, April 22,23 and 24, 1862. N.L.A. |
![]() |
| N.L.A. |
![]() |
| Clerk of the Peace, Forbes, Depositions received entry log for Ben Hall, 1862. Never before published. |
The strong evidence against Ben Hall resulted in his detention, as he awaited transfer to Orange for trial, due to the absence of a Sessions Court in Forbes. Charged with 'Robbery Under Arms,' a conviction would likely mean a long prison sentence for Hall.
Forbes, a town teeming with thousands of residents and plagued by frequent criminal acts, sorely felt the absence of a higher court to handle serious offences. This deficiency became a major point of contention among the local population, as highlighted in a report by the 'Empire' on May 23, 1862. The town's frustration over this judicial shortfall was palpable as they awaited the resolution underscoring the critical need for a local Sessions Court.
Hauled by Sir Frederick Pottinger before the local magistrate. Ben Hall adamantly proclaimed his innocence, contending that he and his co-accused, John Youngman, had accidentally encountered the robbery in progress. Hall argued that the revolver found with him had been picked up earlier in the bush, and that Gardiner had unexpectedly approached them, ordering them to remain where they were. According to Hall, they both compiled, simply sitting on their horses without engaging in the criminal act.
However, a significant question emerged: why hadn't Gardiner also taken the opportunity to rob them, as he had with other unsuspecting individuals during the same incident? This discrepancy, combined with Hall's well-known association with Gardiner, heightened suspicions that Hall was not merely an innocent onlooker but was actively involved as Gardiner's accomplice. This was soon brought to light.
Given the substantial evidence, the portrayal of Ben Hall merely watching as individuals were robbed at gunpoint and coerced into handing over their valuables is particularly disturbing, transcending historical context. Hall and Youngman's failure to either intervene during the robbery or provide evidence about it later intensifies suspicions about their involvement, especially considering their known connections with Gardiner. The idea that the victims, many of whom knew Hall and Youngman personally, would fabricate evidence against them appears highly unlikely. Consequently, it seems evident that Hall was an active collaborator, deeply embedded in Gardiner’s circle.
This conclusion is reinforced by Hall’s inability to secure bail, reflecting the compelling nature of the case built against him, underscored by victim testimonies. The conditions in the cell where Hall was held highlight the inadequate infrastructure of the time, poorly suited to manage the influx of accused in Forbes. The detention facilities were easy to escape and hardly met the needs of the growing town. An 'Empire' article dated April 28th, 1862, starkly illustrates this scenario:
As Ben Hall languished in jail, his support network slowly crumbled. The friendships he once relied on began to fade, significantly affected by his notorious associations with figures like Gardiner, John Gilbert, and O'Meally. His April 1862 arrest marked a pivotal moment, as former loyalties and sympathies waned. Sir Frederick Pottinger, who frequently visited Sandy Creek to track down Gardiner and his crew, exacerbated Hall’s infamy. These visits, driven by suspicions of bushrangers being sheltered in the area, cast Hall as a collaborator with these criminals, tainting Sandy Creek’s reputation akin to notorious places like Arramagong and the Pinnacle.
Pottinger was convinced of Hall and Maguire’s criminal involvements. The inspector, holding a firm belief in the supremacy of justice, and bolstered by Bacon's compelling testimony, saw one of Gardiner’s affiliates finally imprisoned. For Pottinger, securing a conviction against Hall seemed imminent—a much-needed victory. However, Hall saw things differently. Having experienced Pottinger's aggressive approach during his arrest at the Easter Wowingragong race meeting, Hall, now behind bars in Forbes jail, directed his growing bitterness towards Pottinger, staunchly denying any wrongdoing.
In a move to further undermine Hall's reputation among his neighbours, Pottinger launched a public campaign to solidify Hall's image as a bushranger. He strategically placed a notice in the 'NSW Police Gazette', an action clearly aimed at reinforcing Hall’s criminal image and isolating him from any remaining supporters. This public declaration starkly labelled Hall as a bushranger, a step Pottinger hoped would sever Hall’s remaining social ties. The stark announcement appeared in the Gazette's edition of May 14, 1862.
![]() |
| NSW Police Gazette, 14th May 1862. |
The perplexity surrounding the Gazette notice arises from Pottinger's apparent deliberate exclusion of the alleged horse theft. Given the suspicions that the horse in Hall's possession was stolen, it raises questions why this charge wasn't added to the existing accusation of highway robbery, especially considering the severity of horse theft, comparable to Robbery Under Arms.
A potential reason for this omission might be Pottinger’s frustration with the continual dodging and shielding by those linked to Gardiner. Believing Hall to be a significant figure within Gardiner's circle, Pottinger might have viewed the public notice as a strategy to undermine Hall’s credibility among his peers and potentially gather critical information to further implicate Hall and his cohort. This approach was likely a calculated tactic reflecting Pottinger’s intent to break down Gardiner’s network.
![]() |
| Orange Courthouse, c. 1860's. Here Hall's trial took place on 19th May 1862. Hall had been transported to Orange under escort by Sgt Condell. Image courtesy NLA. |
Following this, a shackled Ben Hall, together with co-accused John Youngman, was escorted under heavy guard to Orange, New South Wales, for their trial. This unfolding drama was reported in the 'Lachlan Observer' dated April 25, 1862.
![]() |
| George Colquhoun. c. 1890. Penzig |
While detained in the cells of the Orange courthouse, Ben Hall received visits from his half-brother Thomas Wade and John Maguire. Maguire engaged solicitor George Colquhoun, who in turn appointed the renowned barrister Edward Lee to defend Hall.
Hall’s co-defendant, John Youngman, was also due to stand trial in Orange. The Crown Prosecutor, however, harboured doubts about the robustness of the evidence against Youngman, leading to his being granted bail. Youngman, lacking the personal resources for bail, relied on Maguire and another associate, Peter Murray, who posted £40 each for his release. Youngman seized this opportunity to flee, effectively erasing himself from the annals of bushranging history, leaving Maguire to absorb the financial hit.
With Youngman's escape, Hall's conviction appeared more likely. His trial commenced on Monday, May 19th, 1862. Hall displayed a stoic demeanour in the dock while Bill Bacon, a principal witness, testified to Hall's participation in the robbery, implicating him with Gardiner.
However, the trial took an unexpected turn when Ferguson, a driver employed by Bacon, contradicted his earlier deposition. Initially, he had identified Hall at the Forbes Court as one of the attackers, but at the Orange trial, he expressed doubts about Hall's involvement in the robbery, a development that stunned the courtroom.
After reviewing the now dubious evidence, the jury deliberated briefly before returning a verdict of 'Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt', swayed by the newly introduced uncertainty. There was widespread speculation among the NSW Police and court officials that Ferguson had been tampered with, possibly coerced or bribed by Maguire to change his testimony. Despite these suspicions, the lack of conclusive proof compelled the judge to dismiss the case.
Relieved by his unexpected acquittal, Hall, along with Tom Wade and Maguire, decided to indulge in a night of celebration in Orange. As they left the town in jubilant spirits, they encountered Bacon and Ferguson, an interaction that was undoubtedly charged with tension in light of the day’s proceedings. Maguire recalled departing orange after the court case:
The verdict, however, ignited indignation in R.B. Mitchell, a court official in Forbes and the son of the famous explorer and Surveyor-General of NSW, Sir Thomas Mitchell. Disturbed by Hall's acquittal, Mitchell composed a vehement letter, condemning what he saw as a blatant miscarriage of justice. His intense feelings about the case persisted up to the time of Hall's death, during which he seized the moment to voice his ongoing displeasure with the outcome of the trial. (See article right, a must-read. Open link in new tab to enlarge.)
Author's Note: From the 19th century to the present day, numerous authors and historians have attempted to minimise or negate Ben Hall’s involvement in criminal activities. These accounts often portray Hall as merely an unfortunate bystander, caught up in circumstances beyond his control, rather than an active participant in bushranging.
A specific group of sympathisers has worked to revise history, frequently disputing eyewitness testimonies and official records that implicate Hall in various crimes. This trend of historical reinterpretation is exemplified by a 1934 article from the Scone Advocate, which claims that Hall’s arrest for the Bacon robbery was largely the result of fears held by James Taylor and Bridget Hall, rather than substantial evidence of wrongdoing.
This revisionist narrative aligns with other posthumous portrayals of Hall, which depict him as a conflicted man, haunted by his past actions. However, what exactly tormented him remains unclear.
Was it the ghost of Mrs. Hall?
Was it guilt over his crimes?
Or was it simply the inevitable consequences of his choices?
The old adage "if you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas" seems to best describe Hall’s life, challenging the romanticised notion of him as a benevolent and honest man. Despite attempts to reframe his legacy, official records and contemporary accounts paint a very different picture—one that cannot be ignored.
Undoubtedly dramatic sympathy to justify the unjustifiable, as the 'Scone Advocate' attempts to portray; "but the wrong which Taylor had done did not rest there. Whether on his own initiative or at the instigation of the fly-by-night wife, is not known. Possibly it was a mutual, conspiracy born of fear, to get the outraged husband out of the way lest he might follow the traitorous pair and be avenged. In any case, Taylor supplied spurious information to the police at Forbes, implicating Ben Hall, in a recent bushranging exploit.
Soon after came the Easter meeting at the Wowingragong racecourse, out from Forbes, and it was here that Sir Frederick Pottinger, Bart., head of the police district centered on Forbes, decided to act on the false information secretly supplied by the traitorous Taylor, and in the full publicity of the race assemblage, he arrested Ben Hall on a charge of highway robbery underarms. The meeting was amazed, left breathless, as the news raced about the course. It was impossible — that decent, likeable, well-respected young fellow charged with bushranging.
This amazement was one of the surest indications of his innocence Bushranging was so woven into the social fabric of the district and the period, and its practitioners had so many sympathisers, assistants, bush telegraphs, and such, while so many, others not actually concerned were passively acquiescent of these activities, that it would have been impossible for Ben Hall to take any part without the fact being generally known. His arrest created much indignation and served to deepen the conspiracy of silence which constituted such a barrier between the police on one side and the bushrangers and citizenry on the other. It served also to increase the contempt in which the police were then held."
![]() |
| R.B. Mitchell c. 1882. Courtesy Penzig Collection. |
After his trial, Ben Hall, celebrated the victory by getting immovably drunk. The next morning Ben Hall, Youngman, Maguire and Tom Wade (Ben's half-brother) left for Forbes. About three miles along the road, they overtook Bacon and Ferguson. As they bore them no malice, they all entered into conversation while riding together for 40 miles. Ben Hall returned to Sandy Creek, seemingly resuming a normal life after narrowly escaping conviction. However, his destiny was still unfolding, and it wasn’t long before he would once again court fate. Before his legal troubles, Hall had taken a leisurely trip to Lambing Flat, where he met Susan Prior, a 17-year-old from Tasmania. Charmed by her, he brought her back to Sandy Creek, where she moved in and eventually started a romantic relationship with Hall, leading to her pregnancy.
The Sandy Creek homestead was already teeming with activity, home to Hall’s brother, Bill, his wife, Ann, and their two children, Mary and John. It also served as a regular meeting place for Frank Gardiner and his band of bushrangers.
Upon hearing of Hall’s acquittal, Gardiner, also known as 'The Darkie', made his way to Sandy Creek. As recounted in Maguire’s memoirs, Gardiner visited to offer Hall an apology for his inadvertent role in entangling him in the robbery, adding yet another layer of complexity to the relationships and dynamics at Sandy Creek.
Next day Gardiner called Ben, and expressed regret that Ben had got into trouble through him.
Hall shrugged it off in reply, stated:
Next time they take me they'll have something to take me for.
Following their meeting, Maguire noted that:
From that out, Ben and Gardiner were often together.
![]() |
Sydney Telegraph Office
c. 1862.Image courtesy NLA. |
As Hall’s ties with Gardiner deepened, reports of highway robberies and hold-ups began flooding the public consciousness. News and rumours of their exploits spread rapidly, reaching all corners of society. This surge in information was amplified by the advent of the electric telegraph—a revolutionary technology that allowed for near-instantaneous communication. In many ways, the telegraph was the internet of the 1860s, dramatically increasing both the speed and volume of crime reports while elevating Gardiner and his gang to a level of notoriety previously unseen.
The rapid dissemination of their exploits captivated the public imagination, transforming these bushrangers into folk heroes of the 1860s. Tales of their audacious crimes and fearless escapades enthralled people of all backgrounds, influencing children to mimic their antics in play and cementing their status as near-mythical figures.
Meanwhile, in Sydney’s political circles, the escalating wave of crime that had accompanied the gold rush posed a serious challenge. The increasing boldness of the bushrangers alarmed authorities, forcing them to confront the urgent need to restore order and reassert control over the colony’s rapidly expanding frontier.
Despite returning to his Sandy Creek operation and welcoming new love into his life, Ben Hall's recent close brush with the law had done little to deter him from his path of criminality. In fact, within weeks, Hall would find himself conspiring to commit one of the most audacious crimes in Australian colonial history — the robbery of the 'Forbes Gold Escort'.
Gold, it has been said, is at the root of all evil. Dating back to the days of the Egyptian Pharaohs some 5,000 years ago, gold has been synonymous with power and prestige. It has been the makings of Kings and Queens, and has offered even the poorest the potential for instant, life-changing wealth. In the Australian colonies, this coveted precious metal not only upset the societal status quo, but also transformed countless humble stockmen and farmers into overnight millionaires.
In its wake, the allure of gold sparked an immigration boom. From the Americas to Europe and China, tens of thousands flocked to Australia, eager to stake their claim in the golden opportunity. Ships arrived in thousands, with them the hopes and dreams of countless fortune seekers adding to the burgeoning population of a colony not quite 74 yrs old. It was a time that irrevocably altered the landscape of the Australia. The influx now lay at the feet of Ben Hall and the wealth associated with feeding the droves of new citizens pouring into the Lachlan from his herd.
![]() |
| A NSW mounted gold escort preparing to depart. Image courtesy NLA. |
In this milieu Hall's new acquaintance by 1861, was in love. Frank Gardiner began to have thoughts of abandoning his life of crime. The daily loot of cash, jewellery, and gold he stripped from his unfortunate victims no longer seemed to satisfy his needs. The constant challenge of living rough was becoming increasingly unbearable, and even his safe havens as in Catherine Brown's home were fraught with danger and the growing monotony of life with a six gun, not to mention the escalating costs fanned the idea of a great haul, a one off.
However, with the constant threat of betrayal and the NSW police on his shoulder, Gardiner's audacious exploits garnered him notoriety and regular coverage in the press. Such publicity, while bolstering his infamous reputation, also provided the police with valuable leads for his capture. Gardiner's ability to elude the authorities was indeed bewildering. He even went so far as to pen letters to newspapers, boldly highlighting his knack for moving freely among the police undetected.
![]() |
| S.M.H. 8th May 1862. |
Gardiner may have been inspired by a daring and highly publicised robbery in Victoria back in 1853. A private gold escort, heavily guarded by the Victorian police and transporting gold from the McIvor diggings to Bendigo, was ambushed and robbed by a gang of six men. Splitting into two groups, one attacked the police while the other seized the gold. In the ensuing action, four police officers were wounded. The event created quite a sensation. The gang managed to escape with over 2,300 ounces of gold and £800 in cash.
Meanwhile, as Gardiner was gathering information for his heist, the local newspapers he had been reading began to express serious concerns about the inadequate police protection afforded to the escorts. On 30th January 1862, the 'Western Examiner' voiced its worries:
Fully aware of the concerns raised by the 'Western Examiner', Frank Gardiner was emboldened. He knew that the limited police guard could easily be overwhelmed, and this gave him the confidence to finalise the details of his audacious plan. John Maguire, a close associate who witnessed the events both before and after the heist, vividly recalls Gardiner's ambitious scheme:
![]() |
| William Hall. c. 1910. (Penzig) |
![]() |
| Daniel Charters. c. 1862. Courtesy Mrs Fred Wells (Coloured by Author) |
![]() |
| Foreground view of Escort Rock as Fagan would have seen on approach, 2013. My photo. |
View from behind
Eugowra Rock
as the coach
approached the hidden
bushrangers, 2013.
My photo.
|
![]() |
Sgt James Condell. Coloured by me.
|
However, for Condell and Moran, the wounds upon further investigation were not considered life-threatening. Constables Haviland and Rafferty providentially appeared unhurt, including the coach driver, Mr Fagan, who in turn had been very lucky as many whizzing bullets passed through his hat and coat. The whip or driver of the coach John Fagan describes his close encounter:
![]() |
| Jack Fagan. c. 1900's. |
Upon encountering Hanbury Clements and his brother William, who were making their way towards the scene of the crime, the grazier assisted the injured police, who had managed to emerge from the bush. They were escorted to Clements' homestead, where they received immediate first aid. Following this, Hanbury embarked on a 25-mile ride to Forbes, the objective of his journey being to “carry intelligence of the affair”.
When word of the audacious heist reached the public, the entire colony was left in a state of shock. Instantaneously, Frank Gardiner became an infamous figure, his notoriety spreading far and wide. His daring act had not just stolen gold, but had also brazenly challenged the existing law and order, leaving an indelible mark on the narrative of colonial Australia. 'Sydney Morning Herald', Saturday 21st June 1862:
![]() |
| Sub Commissioner for Lachlan Goldfield J.G. Grenfell. 1829-1866 Newspaper Image c. 1867. |
![]() |
| Hanbury Clements. c. 1881. Private Source. First time published. |
As they advanced towards Clements' residence, they ran into the draymen who had witnessed the entire robbery. Pottinger interrogated them thoroughly, striving to reconstruct the events that led to what was one of the boldest robberies of that time.
| Hanbury Clements station Eugowra. Bailliere's New South Wales Gazetteer and Road Guide, 1866 |
![]() |
| NSW Police Gazette, August 1862. |
As word of the robbery spread throughout the colony, the machinery of justice sprang into action. Troopers from surrounding districts were rapidly deployed and converged on the area, reinforcing the teams already scouring the harsh terrain for the perpetrators. This swift and organised response highlighted the seriousness of the situation and the determination to capture those responsible.
![]() |
| Mr Charles Cropper. c. 1900. Never before published. |
As the search parties scoured the landscape, the perpetrators – Ben Hall, Charters, and Gardiner – adroitly evaded their pursuers, making their way towards the relative safety of Wheogo Hill, a stone's throw away from Hall's homestead. The seeming insouciance of their retreat spoke volumes about their intimate knowledge of the terrain and the confidence they had in their ability to outwit the law.
![]() |
| Eugowra Escort Coach. Photograph was taken in 1917 at Orange, by W. H. Burgess. This was also the coach in which Cost Haviland died. Many thanks to Dick Adams. |
![]() |
| Mrs Haviland's gratuity. |
William Haviland's death thus became a sombre milestone as the first fatality in the recently organised and restructured NSW Police Force during active duty. His premature demise brought a poignant dimension to the narrative of these turbulent times.
Tragically, William Haviland's death left his wife and two children without a husband and father. His untimely demise was an indirect result of the chaos instigated by Ben Hall, setting the stage for the unfortunate accident. In another sorrowful twist linked to the legacy of the 1862 Eugowra attack, Henry Moran, who had survived the ambush, met a similar fate years later. At the age of 63, he passed away in 1890 after falling from a cart at Hilton Grove, Hartley. The long-lasting impacts of the daring actions initiated by Hall continued to affect the lives of those involved, long after the events themselves had faded.
![]() |
| "Make way for the Royal Mail." Sketch by Percy Lindsay. c. 1935. |
As the law enforcement continued their pursuit and the gang dispersed, Hanbury Clement penned a letter to a friend in Bathurst, providing a vivid account of the robbery and its repercussions. He commended Sergeant Condell for his level-headedness during the assault. Notably, Clements emphasised that three bullock teams obstructed the road, and the only member not masked was Frank Gardiner. Impressively, one of the guards managed to traverse the twenty-five miles back to Forbes through the wilderness. This excerpt from a letter received by a gentleman in Bathurst was published in the Free Press on June 24, 1862:
![]() |
| George Burgess. c. 1930's Very rare photo. Private Source. |
![]() |
Mr Penzig's re-drawn Map from the
originally sketched NSW Policeat the time of the Robbery.© |
![]() |
| Back to Molong Celebrations. 1928. |
![]() |
| The police original map of bushrangers track too and from Eugowra. Courtesy Bathurst Historical Museum. |
Fortunately for the beleaguered police, they were able to claim a significant victory within days of the robbery when Sgt Charles Sanderson, accompanied by Senior Constables Armour and Burke, Constables Powell and Westhead, and the tracker Charlie, discovered the gang's hideout near Ben Hall and John Maguire's homes at Wheogo and located atop Wheogo Hill, some 32 miles from Forbes and 60 miles from Eugowra, the hideout was strikingly close to Gardiner's lover Catherine Brown on Wheogo Station some half mile west from the hill.
Sanderson's determination to head straight for Ben Hall's residence clearly indicated that the police harboured suspicions about Hall's alleged connections to bushranging activities. However, when they arrived, Hall was absent, at that moment he was a short distance away atop Wheogo Hill, counting his ill-gotten gains.
Sanderson's track record as a diligent trooper was invaluable to the Forbes police at this time. He had proven his mettle during the Chinese riots at Lambing Flat in 1861, serving as a right-hand man to Captain Zouch. His commitment to maintaining law and order contrasted starkly with the behaviour of others who were quick to abandon their duties in pursuit of instant wealth at the goldfields. Nonetheless, despite these challenging times, dedicated men like Charles Sanderson were emerging as stalwarts, forming the backbone of the police's efforts to combat the rampant crime wave.
![]() |
| View from Gardiner's camp Wheogo Hill. Weddin Mountains in the foreground. Courtesy Peter C Smith |
![]() |
| View of Wheogo Hill from Deaths Lane. 2013. My photo. |
Charles Sanderson upon his retirement in 1903, reflected on his search for the gang, recounting his actions independent of Sir Frederick Pottinger. He detailed his decision to head for Hall's home and his ultimate success in securing the gold laden packhorse. His account, published in 'Old Times' in May 1903, provides an intriguing account of the dramatic events.
![]() |
| Johnny Gilbert. Coloured by me. |
![]() |
| Charles Gilbert. Private Source. |
Unbeknownst to them, as Pottinger rode up to the group and engaged Gilbert in conversation, he found himself speaking directly to one of the very individuals he was hunting. Pottinger, none the wiser, casually queried Gilbert about the quality of the horse he was riding.
![]() |
| Marker commemorating the gunfight opposite Mrs Sproules Station. My photo 12/03/20 |
![]() |
| The arrest of Ben Hall, William Hall, and Dan Charters, by Sir Frederick Pottinger depicted by Monty Wedd, from Bold Ben Hall. c. 1970's © |
Six weeks after the Eugowra robbery, on the 27th of July, 1862, Ben Hall was taken into custody along with his brother William Hall, his brothers-in-law John Brown (husband of Catherine Brown), John Maguire, and his close friend Daniel Charters. They were all apprehended at Sandy Creek. Pottinger had received reliable information regarding these men's knowledge and involvement in the events at Eugowra. The informant was Maguire's friend Tom Richards, who later served as a voluntary crown witness during the 1863 Sydney Escort Trials. Richards had been present during the planning stages of the Eugowra robbery at Maguire's.
![]() |
| Sir Frederick Pottinger. c. 1863. |
![]() |
| Ben Hall & others court appearance August 1862. |
![]() |
| Daniel Charters. c. 1862. |
John Maguire's Darlinghurst Gaol entry log February 1863.
Note that John Maguire was blind in his right eye until publication; this information was unknown. |
![]() |
| Robert Hall. c. 1870. |
In the course of the trial of the four accused escort robbery individuals — Bow, Fordyce, Manns, and Maguire — Sgt Sanderson, the much-celebrated hero of Wheogo, was summoned to testify about his commendable endeavours in recapturing half of the stolen loot. Sanderson once more shed a more detailed light on the scene at Gardiner's camp on Wheogo Hill.
Wheogo Hill rose to an elevation of 430 meters providing a panoramic vista of the surrounding areas. Sanderson, in his testimony, vividly described the spectacle that awaited them at the bushrangers' camp after their spirited chase of Warrigal Walsh from Hall's home to the summit of Wheogo Hill.
![]() |
| Report of the hold-up of Sale of Sandy Creek in 1865, for £3000. |
This juncture heralded a profound transformation for Ben Hall. Once prospering and standing tall with an untarnished reputation, Hall found himself abruptly caught in the grip of an uncompromising descent. Ben Hall's once abundant and esteemed life was now facing the winds of change. It was a pivotal moment that marked the beginning of an unanticipated chapter in Hall's personal narrative.
![]() |
| New South Wales Government Gazette Friday, 23rd October 1863. |
Warrigal was with Gardiner at Wheogo Hill during Sanderson's arrival, and was the individual attempting to head towards Hall's location, to pickup more saddle bags to cart the gold of Eugowra in eluded the police by leaping across a creek.
Wilson eventually gained control of Uoka (Wheogo), after Warrigal's death only to sell the lease three years later in 1866. Sandy Creek's value was estimated value ranged between £3,000 and £8,000, factoring in new dwellings, stock and improvements. As of 1864, both John Maguire and Ben Hall still were noted as lessees with an outstanding debt to the New South Wales government for rent of £5 10 s for Sandy Creek dating back to November 1862. It was recorded that a partial payment of £3 15s was made in late 1863 when Sandy Creek was still under Hall and Maguire's control, leaving some of the debt unsettled.
| Uoka Station, Bailliere's New South Wales Gazetteer, 1866. |
![]() |
| NSW Gazette November 1862, a notice of forfeiture of Sandy Creek. |
With the sale of beef to the nearby goldfields of Forbes and Lambing Flat, a mere forty-five miles away, their income was readily supplemented. This is corroborated by Charters' statement at the Special Commission that he and Hall were rounding up cattle for market when Pottinger made his unexpected appearance in 1862. Further indicating their comfortable financial standing, William Hall, was also arrested holding over £60 in his possession at the time.
Moreover, Maguire was able to afford the services of a cook and housekeeper named Mrs Shanahan, which implied a lack of financial distress. Despite these seemingly comfortable circumstances, it appears that Ben may on Bridget's fleeing with James Taylor have succumbed to the allure of easy money and the excitement of the lifestyle offered by Gardiner. With no home, no family, and devoid of the warm embrace of his son Henry noted as the sunshine of his life to return to at the end of a long day's work and no boy, Ben Hall began to drift away to the more seedy side of life. Hall abandoned his undoubted wealth and prosperous farm for the thrill of a fast horse and the power of a six-gun.
Following the exit of Ben Hall and Maguire from Sandy Creek, the lease value for Wilson escalated dramatically. From the initial annual rent of £5 10 s, it surged to £40, a testament to the significant enhancements made to the station. The once-rough scrubland had been transformed into an exceptional property, boasting well-appointed stockyards and residences. This considerable rise in value, over a short period, is indicative of the considerable efforts both men invested in creating a thriving pastoral enterprise. Yet, through a series of unfortunate events, they saw their hard work evaporate and lost everything. (See article above right.)
![]() |
| The Peak Hill Express, 5th July 1907. NLA. |
![]() |
| Susan Prior c. 1862. |
However, this burgeoning family was compromised as Hall deepened his association with Gardiner, participating in the April 1862 Bacon dray robbery and the notorious June 1862 Escort robbery. There is some speculation that Susan's presence might have represented a brief period of attempted reform for Hall before these events, but such attempts to stay on the straight and narrow seemed fleeting at best.
In this time of turbulence, a controversial portrait emerged, often erroneously attributed to Bridget. However, by the end of 1861, Bridget had already entered a relationship with James Taylor, making it highly doubtful that she would have posed for a portrait with her estranged husband. Bridget and Ben's relationship had become mired in acrimony by the dawn of 1862, and despite any shortcomings Taylor may have had, Bridget remained faithfully by his side until his death in 1877.
![]() |
John Wilson c. 1872 New South Wales, Australia,Gaol Description and Entrance Books,1818-1930 |
William Hall, with Sandy Creek home fired decided to venture into gold mining, relocated to the Pinnacle Range. It was here, at the site known both as the Pinnacle Reef and Maguire's Reef, that he initiated his mining operations. Eventually, he settled down in Parkes, where he would spend the remainder of his days. As times became increasingly turbulent, Ben Hall often used the Pinnacle Reef as a hideout.
Meanwhile, prior to Bill Hall's departure from Ben Hall's former residence at Sandy Creek, the household expanded with Susan Prior, her mother Mary, sister Charlotte, and brother William in residence.
![]() |
| Susan Prior and her youngest daughter Esther Stonham. Note the striking resemblance between Mother and Daughter. Susan right. c. 1862, aged 17. Esther Stonham never published before. Private Source. |
Moreover, the story seems to foster a misplaced sympathy for Hall, who was initially seen by many in his district as a respectable, industrious individual. The image, however, faded quickly with Hall's multiple arrests and the public's increasing awareness of his association with Gardiner and his gang. The tale of the decimated livestock further clouds Hall's culpability in his bushranging activities by redirecting blame on his destructive path towards the NSW police and Sir Frederick Pottinger's supposed persecution of Hall - a claim entirely without basis.
The reality of the situation at Sandy Creek Station in 1862 and prior to is well documented. The homestead was inhabited by William Hall, his wife Ann, their two children, and the then-pregnant Susan Prior and her mother Mary and siblings William and Charlotte. Additionally, Hall's former in-laws, the Walsh family, along with John Brown, resided nearby, within a mile or so and his partner John Maguire his wife Elen and children lived close by Hall's home.
To suggest that these individuals would allow the livestock to succumb to such cruel fate, without intervening, or checking on them would be inconceivable. Given the critical importance of these animals for sustenance and survival in such an isolated location, such neglect is simply implausible. Would these people have ignored the audible distress of the suffering animals?
At the second escort trial in 1863, Sir Frederick Pottinger was questioned under oath about the circumstances surrounding the arrests of Ben and William Hall and Dan Charters. His responses shed light on the individuals' reactions at the time of his arrival, the condition of the livestock, and the suspicious cash found on Bill Hall at the time:
Authors Note: It must also be noted that £1 in 1862 is equal today to $84.00.
![]() |
| Mary's Baptism Certificate. Purchased by author. |
![]() |
| The Empire. 16th August, 1862. Ridicule of Pottinger's confrontation. |
On that occasion Pottinger had laid a stakeout at the home of Catherine Brown, Gardiner's paramour, in Wheogo, accompanied by eight officers. The Inspector had received credible intelligence that 'The Darkie' would show up for a romantic rendezvous with Mrs Brown. Indeed, the information proved accurate when, under the cover of darkness, Gardiner was seen arriving on his white steed. Pottinger, seizing the element of surprise, abruptly stood and fired at Gardiner point-blank, who was completely taken aback. However, owing to a malfunction in Pottinger's rifle, Gardiner managed to slip away, evading the eight strategically positioned troopers. Two of them discharged their weapons but missed Gardiner, who disappeared into the night. Pottinger under oath described the moments.
As the pine scrub in which myself and Sergeant Saunderson were hid was 150 yards distant, we could not identify her; about twenty minutes afterwards I saw a man on a white horse with a gun slung by the saddle, proceeding from the house; he proceeded quietly along in a certain direction 80 or 100 yards, from which he finally deviated, taking a cattle track through the scrub; up to this period myself and Saunderson proceeded in a parallel direction through the scrub, but when he diverged we fell back; presently we heard the sound of horse's hoofs proceeding slowly towards us. I waited until he had arrived within five yards, when I stepped out, and levelled my carbine at him over the horse's shoulder, with the muzzle within three yards of the rider's body; I called out 'stand;' the rider, I swear was Frank Gardiner; he immediately uttered a yell or shriek, and threw up his arms into the air, still holding the rein; at this moment the horse turned away, and determined not to lose a chance; I pulled the trigger; the cap missed fire, and the next moment the horse bolted into the bush; the shriek was that of a man already shot; I called out to Saunderson and the trooper to shoot the wretch; Saunderson fired two shots from his revolver, and Hollister fired at him, but was 100 yards distant or thereabout, and Newton was too far off.
Moreover, it was reported that Gardiner having bolted reined his horse some five hundred yards away:
Up started then Sir Fred. and his men, with cock'd carbine in band. And call'd aloud on the Ranger proud, on pain of death, to "stand;" But the Ranger proud, he laughed aloud, and bounding rode away, While Sir Frederick Pott. shut his eyes for a shot, and miss'd—in his usual way.
Yet, the exploits of the bushrangers held an irresistible allure, drawing extensive coverage in the newspapers and becoming the topic of conversation in homes, restaurants, and hotels. The trend even inspired children to mimic the bushrangers in play, causing a wave of concern over the idolisation of figures like Gardiner and, in due course, Ben Hall. In response, 'The Goulburn Chronicle' expressed deep worry over the growing number of children pretending to be bushrangers in its issue from October 24, 1862. The newspaper cautioned its readers, stating:![]() |
| Wanted notice NSW Police Gazette, 1863. |
The NSW Police Gazette contained descriptions of perpetrators who closely resembled the known physical characteristics of Gardiner, Gilbert, O'Meally, Hall, and other known acquaintances such as the three Jacks, Patsy Daley, and another emerging bushranger, young John Jameison, a close friend of John Walsh. These records provided crucial information that helped keep track of the infamous outlaws' activities and movements. In some instances the criminals were named.(See above.)
![]() |
| Hall Robbery NSW Police Gazette, 14th January 1863. |
However, the bushrangers didn't lay low for long. On the following day, January 14, 1863, they struck again, robbing David M'Veigh 10 miles outside of Forbes on the heavily trafficked road to Lambing Flat. These successive robberies further underscored the audacity of the bushrangers, who continued their exploits seemingly unimpeded by the threat of capture.
![]() |
| Mrs Brown, NSW Police Gazette. |
However, many of these correspondents appeared reluctant to name these suspects in newspaper articles, likely as a self-preservation strategy. The act of publishing their speculations often ran the risk of alerting the bushrangers or their confederates about the extent of information held by the police, potentially providing them with a forewarning to evade capture or alter their criminal strategies. Thus, the bushranging epidemic continued, with the names of those involved often whispered in hushed tones, rather than splashed across the public press.
![]() |
| Ben Hall wanted NSW Police Gazette 1863. Note age. Height incorrect. Should read 5 ft 6 in. |
January 1863 marked the reappearance of John Gilbert in the Lachlan District, following a period of absence after the notorious Escort robbery. His lucky escape from Inspector Pottinger in July 1862 had led him to New Zealand's South Island. Accompanied by his two brothers, Gilbert had found temporary refuge at Clyde on the Dunstan goldfield. On his return to NSW, he wasted no time jumping back into the saddle, revisiting his old stomping grounds around the Weddin Mountains and its surrounding districts, including Marengo, Gilbert's former home.
This homecoming was not a quiet affair. Gilbert quickly reestablished himself, joining forces with O'Meally and Hall. Known collectively as 'The Boys,' they launched a spree of plundering local establishments with reckless abandon. As reported by the "Sydney Morning Herald" on February 7th, 1863, Gilbert's return was anything but inconspicuous.
In quick succession, many robberies were Gazetted by police fitting Ben Hall's description. However, many of these robberies as the one above were littered with unknowns and in some cases as many as eight or nine would be bushrangers:
![]() |
| NSW Police Gazette February 1863. Note; Hall's description- 5 ft 6 in. Hall's height would vary in future police Gazettes from 5 ft 6 in-5 ft 8 in. |
![]() |
| NSW Police Gazette, February 1863. |
Interestingly, the Police Gazette initially named Patrick O'Meally, younger brother of John O'Meally, as one of the bushrangers. However, upon subsequent investigation by Captain Zouch, Patrick was found to be innocent of this particular crime. He was arrested by police for his alleged involvement in the two robberies, but upon examination, the young man was exonerated, proving that not all initial suspect identifications were accurate.
![]() |
| NSW Police Gazette, February 1863. |
As fate would have it, during the robbery, a police trooper named Constable Stewart happened to pass by the scene. This chance occurrence was to significantly alter the trajectory of the event, adding a further layer of tension and potential for chaos to the unfolding scenario.
![]() |
| Boland. Police Gazette 1863. |
On 26th September 1863, Mr Dickenson offered his unique account of the robbery and actions of the bushrangers during Patsy Daley's trial, as reported by the 'Goulburn Herald'. His testimony would add another riveting chapter to the captivating saga that was Ben Hall and his gang's life of crime.
![]() |
| NSW Police Gazette, Frank Gardiner & John Gilbert. |
Yet, the path to a reformed police force was not without its hurdles. The police found themselves in daunting situations as they grappled with the task of establishing law and order in the harsh western territories and remote settlements.
The gold rush had a profound impact, not only on the colony but also on the isolated towns. As tens of thousands flocked to the new goldfields with each discovery, a climate of lawlessness took hold. Robberies, beatings, and murders became disturbingly common. In this chaotic environment, opportunistic thieves thrived, and audacious bushrangers, who openly defied law and order, began to emerge. Ben Hall was one such figure who carved his name into the annals of notorious bushrangers.
Mr Charles Cowper, the Colonial Secretary, often earned the moniker 'Slippery Charley' due to his cunning political manoeuvring. During his tenure, he faced the daunting challenge of confronting a new and audacious wave of lawlessness and an influx of world citizens with many different traditions and outlooks and many not afraid to throw themselves into the rough and tumble of the goldfields. Furthermore the vast lack of education to the often claimed idle youth who thought it a lark to nick horses and cattle meandered across the colony haunting sly grog shops and the seedy backwater towns quick to saddle up and emerge as bushrangers. In his estimation, the solution to quelling the lawlessness lay in the substantial financial rewards - incentives he believed would set the hearts of 'cockatoo squatters' racing at the windfall, and pave the way for apprehending these outlaws. The Manaro Mercury, and Cooma and Bombala Advertiser, on the 13th February 1863 wrote:
However, the Colonial Secretary was off the mark as the old convict distrust amongst the Cockatoo Squatters held firm and the police blocked in their inquiries. As Hall continued to carve out a name for himself in this lawless world, the echo of a once familiar name - Gardiner - still resonated with many reported robberies. Yet the erstwhile leader's whereabouts remained an enigma, prompting one correspondent to comment:
![]() |
| Earnest Bowler 1830-1896 Private Source. |
Later that evening, Bowler found himself back at the public house on the Pinnacle Station, sharing a meal in the kitchen when whispers that 'The Boys' (local slang for bushrangers) were lurking nearby began to circulate. Bowler vividly recounts Hall's dramatic arrival following the earlier recovery of the horses:
![]() |
| NSW Police Gazette, February 1863. |
![]() |
| Pinnacle Station with Weddin Mountains in the background. |
Recognising the men, Hollister and his two trackers immediately took up pursuit, engaging in a high-stakes chase peppered with gunfire. One of Hollister's trackers, Billy Dargin, later provided a firsthand account of the harrowing events that unfolded.
| NSW Police Gazette, March 1863. |
The Pinnacle Station and its police presence were depicted in a 1863 edition of the Sydney Morning Herald:
His collaboration with Patrick Daley in the Pinnacle hold-up was confirmed by eyewitness accounts. It wasn't a case of mere coincidence. Even when Hall claimed he merely ran into Daley for a drink at Allports' pub and was incidentally in the vicinity during the Pinnacle hold-up, Constable Knox identified him as Daley's accomplice. Knox would have been familiar with Hall from his time spent at Pinnacle with Charters. It was also common knowledge that Constable Knox was romantically involved with Daniel Charters' widowed sister, Margaret Feehily.
However, Hall's account — that he had left Allports with Daley and was casually riding home when trooper Hollister began pursuing them based on Knox's information — doesn't hold water. Why would an innocent man flee and brazenly exchange gunfire with troopers? This act alone gives credence to the guilt he professed to not bear. And it was unfortunate for Hall that Hollister knew him well, most likely due to Hollister's awareness of Hall's notorious associations and recent criminal activities.
Ben Hall, Daley, and O'Maley, three well-known bushrangers.
Numerous newspaper reports, entries in the NSW Police Gazette, and accounts by respected citizens like Ernest Bowler and Charles MacAlister, among others, all provide solid evidence for what the police had long suspected: Ben Hall had long been embroiled in the world of bushranging, a fact all too familiar to the local populace of the Lachlan region.
After his encounters with Knox and Hollister, wherein shots were exchanged, the NSW Police Gazette published a disturbing account on February 13, 1863 following the confrontation with Hollister.
![]() |
| NSW Police Gazette, 13th February 1863. |
Moreover, the brutal attack on Mrs. Finnigan marked a turning point in Ben Hall's criminal career. The incident at the Pinnacle had already exposed Hall's ruthless nature, but his assault on Mrs. Finnigan indicated a drastic escalation in his disregard for societal norms. Now, more than ever, Hall seemed to be on a reckless path that could only end in prolonged imprisonment, death on the gallows, or a violent end in a shootout.
![]() |
| Gardiner & Gilbert. c. 1862. |
One might also note that the accomplices Hall kept were often from similar backgrounds as himself. Like him, they were children of convicts, raised among cattle and horse thieves who took advantage of any opportunity to steal. This new breed of bushrangers, including John Peisley, O’Meally and Fred Lowry, shared a common bond of lawlessness passed down through generations of parents who lived on the take. Family ties and close friendships often drew Hall and his associates into their criminal lifestyle, and the older generation's tales of past adventures and their longstanding distrust of authority played no small part in influencing them. Ben Hall himself witnessed his father and older brothers stealing livestock. Through prolonged idleness the situation was exacerbated by no coherent discipline nor education. The back country school was unheard of as tutors filled, for those who could afford, them the void. The 'Empire' newspaper on March 12th, 1863, aptly summarised the bushranging epidemic's adverse impact on the country:
![]() |
| J.H.M. Abbott. c. 1919. |
The regularity of the Ben Hall's outrages and many successes were often due to the ability to remain one step ahead of the frequently befuddled NSW police. Hall and his cohorts' achievements and easy access to money were facilitated by reliable intelligence. The Cockatoo Squatter and the bush telegraph all eager for some easy cash or goods. Furthermore, they had a wide selection of high-quality thoroughbred horses and a variety of firearms easily obtainable from many larger stations. In contrast, the NSW police had to contend with inferior horses and subpar equipment. The law enforcers also had to deal with numerous settlers who were in league with the desperadoes and had established a 'Cone of Silence' against the police.
However, an article published in the 'Sydney Morning Herald' on 17th February 1863 expressed hope that the NSW Government, through the new police and the courts, would soon eliminate all the troubled districts' bushrangers. This included their extensive network of supporters and Cockatoo squatters. Expectations were high, as reported:
In certain situations, local residents stepped in to fill the void, adopting the roles of self-styled constables. These individuals often administered vigilante-style justice, doling out summary punishments to transgressors, as highlighted:
As Ben Hall was igniting chaos across the western plains, other long-past criminal activities related to the Hall family at Murrurundi were brought to light in parliament, events still vivid in the memories of some. 'The Empire' newspaper in 1863 revisited one such episode concerning the past criminal exploits of Ben Hall's father. This incident was commented on by Mr. Joseph Jehoshaphat Harpur, a Parliamentarian.
![]() |
| Joseph Jehoshaphat Harpur |
After all, three of his mother's stepdaughters, who were also Harpur's stepsisters, were involved in relationships with individuals deeply entrenched in criminal activities. Harpur shared his insights:
Undoubtedly, Harpur's intimate knowledge of the Lachlan bushrangers was likely informed through his mother. His familial ties subsequently tarnished his reputation within the NSW Parliament, as he was perceived as being lenient due to his family's associations. This leniency was notably absent in his stance towards the rigorous measures proposed by the Cowper Government to address the bushranger menace. In July 1863, Harpur's perceived soft approach was brought to light:
![]() |
| Lambing Flat. c. 1862. Courtesy NLA. |
![]() |
| Lambing Flat. Boorowa Street. c. 1862. Courtesy NLA. |
In an ironic twist, many members of Hall's gang had chosen to dress as police troopers for this particular heist, possibly using uniforms they had stolen from the Pinnacle Police Station. This tactic, while certainly bold, must have caused immense confusion and fear amongst the local populace, making the gang's lawless activities even more disruptive and threatening.
However, a moment of remarkable bravery came from an unexpected source - the shop boy. Seizing one of Solomon's revolvers from the counter, he aimed at one of the bushrangers. In a chilling moment, another gang member seized a pregnant Mrs Solomon, threatening to "blow Mrs Solomon's brains out" unless the boy dropped his weapon. The boy, recognising the danger to Mrs Solomon, reluctantly dropped the gun, commenting, "If it hadn't been for Mrs Solomon I'd have stopped your run."
This robbery was widely reported, including in 'The Newcastle Chronicle and Hunter River District News' on Saturday 7th March 1863. The evidence presented in these reports suggested that it was indeed Jack O'Meally who had earlier fired the fatal shot that killed Mr Cirkel. (In colonial Australia, hundreds of newspapers existed and re-produced the same articles from their original source thru the Electric Telegraph.)
Following the robbery, the use of the stolen Pinnacle police items appeared in the 'Sydney News:
![]() |
| Typical country store. c. 1860's. Image courtesy NLA. |
The article gave a vivid account of the audacity and ruthlessness of Ben Hall's gang during the robbery. Solomon recounted how they burst into his store in the middle of the afternoon, their pack horses waiting outside to carry off their spoils. Despite the terrifying threat to his wife's life, his shop boy showed remarkable courage, attempting to stand up to the intruders.
In addition to detailing the events of the robbery, the report also served to highlight the brutal and lawless nature of the bushrangers. Their threats against Mrs. Solomon, who was heavily pregnant at the time, were particularly shocking, showing a clear disregard for innocent lives.
The eyewitness account provided by Mr. Solomon served to heighten the sense of fear and urgency felt by local communities in the face of these escalating crimes. The report also shed further light on the identity of Jack O'Meally as the individual who had earlier fired the fatal shot that killed Mr. Cirkel.
![]() |
| NSW Police Gazette, 11th March 1863. |
This portrayal painted a picture of a police force that was either incapacitated by fear or hampered by apathy. The bushrangers were running rampant, and the police, who should have been the protectors of the community, seemed unable to counteract the escalating threat.
The police's actions, or lack thereof, further frustrated and frightened the local communities. People looked to the police for protection and justice, but they were being let down. The authorities' seeming inability to control the situation only served to embolden the bushrangers, allowing them to continue their reign of terror with seeming impunity and much support from those willing to be bush-telegraphs.
This confusion could likely be attributed to Hall's seniority compared to the rest of the gang, as well as his commanding presence. His previous reputation as a respected stockman and station owner may have endowed him with a demeanour that, when turned to criminal pursuits, was reminiscent of the charismatic and influential Gardiner. This inadvertent association bolstered Hall's reputation, unintentionally casting him in a role that he was swiftly growing into: the feared leader of a notorious gang of bushrangers.
However, the reality was quite different. Following Gardiner's narrow escape from the clutches of Sir Frederick Pottinger in August 1862, he and his lover, Catherine Brown, had left the Lachlan area. Around late October 1862, the pair embarked on a challenging journey north towards the Peak Downs goldfield, via Rockhampton. Finally reaching Apis Creek in Queensland, they had travelled an impressive distance of approximately 900 miles as the crow flies. Their journey was made in a spring cart through terrains that varied from challenging to outright inhospitable.
Despite this, the press was awash with speculations and various reports regarding Gardiner's supposed location. Some believed he had relocated to South Australia in the guise of a priest, others suggested he had gone to Portland, Victoria or Gippsland where his family lived. There were even assumptions that Gilbert's family was based in South Australia. These reports highlighted the widespread confusion and the prevalent rumours surrounding Gardiner's whereabouts. A case in point being a report in the 'Launceston Examiner' on Tuesday 30th September 1862, which was further fueling the speculative fire.
![]() |
| "next time you bring me here it will be for something, and don't you forget it."- Ben Hall. |
Mr Redman, a member of Parliament and Hall's former defence counsel, commented later on Hall's character and the circumstances that led to his turn to bushranging.
Ben Hall, prior to his entering upon the career of a bushranger, bore an unexceptionable character. He was well known in the Lachlan District as a hardworking, industrious, and honest man, who had by his own efforts risen from a humble position to be the proprietor of a station. A squatter of that district stated that he had known Hall intimately for some years, and that his character for honesty and industry stood so high that he would have trusted him with all he possessed.
Unfortunately, Hall became implicated in a horse-stealing case, and although the charges were dismissed, his reputation had been tarnished. The police, however, seemed to have marked him down, and on more than one occasion he was brought up on charges which were later proved to be entirely false. This injustice, and the suspicion which was constantly thrown upon him, caused Hall to become reckless, and he eventually threw in his lot with the bushrangers.
He was a man who might have been reclaimed, who might have been made a useful member of society, but the law and its administration instead of reaching out a hand to save him, pushed him to the very brink of the precipice, and then left him to his fate. No wonder that, feeling himself outlawed and persecuted, he should become a desperate and dangerous criminal.
Redman's depiction of Hall's story stirred sympathy and evoked questions about the workings of the judicial system. According to Redman, Hall was driven to a life of crime due to continuous targeting by the police, despite the charges against him being proved false repeatedly. It was the failure by the systems heavy hand, Redman argued, that transformed a hardworking, honest man into one of the most notorious bushrangers in Australian history.
Indeed, while Mr Redman's perspective provides a sympathetic lens through which to view Ben Hall's life, it is vital to remember that it does not justify the actions that Hall took. It's important to note that, while he may have been subject to minor injustices' and persecution, his response—to embark on a violent path of criminality—holds no excuse
Hall's lack of formal education might have limited his options in some ways, but he but he had established a fine cattle property was still capable of making better choices. However, it's clear that he was through associations with Gardiner not just a passive recipient of circumstances. His expert knowledge in bushcraft was to make him a formidable adversary for the law enforcement agencies trying to apprehend him.
Ultimately, Ben Hall made a choice to lead a life marked by violence and crime. He perpetrated or was involved in serious crimes such as murder, attempted murder, kidnapping, theft, arson, intimidation, assault, and robbery, spreading fear and distress. His actions caused harm to many. Therefore, while it is crucial to understand the circumstances that might have led him down such a path, it is equally important not to romanticise or excuse his choices and actions.
It's important to note that he did not operate in a vacuum. He was influenced by individuals like Gardiner and sought their approval, adopting the same blend of charm and menace in his interactions with others. This dual persona could have been an attempt to maintain some level of public sympathy or gain protection from those he encountered. However, such calculated manipulations do not negate the seriousness of his crimes.
Furthermore, the assertion that his actions were due to external circumstances such as police pressure or marital troubles lacks substance when weighed against his subsequent actions. The choices Hall made were not reactionary but premeditated and strategic, indicating a degree of agency in his actions.
Next in the annuls of outrage Hall and his associates attempt to kill a police inspector and a blacktracker illustrating a level of aggression and lawlessness that characterised Hall's activities. Such instances highlight that despite any perceived veneer of respectability or charm, at his core, Hall was a violent and dangerous man.
![]() |
| John Oxley Norton. (1829-1880) Private Source. Never Before Published. |
The presence of these men was suspicious, and it was clear that this chance meeting was about to take a dangerous turn. Norton and Dargin prepared themselves for a potential confrontation. In these perilous times, officers of the law had to always be ready for encounters with outlaws who were just as likely to fight as they were to flee. The event and outcome are narrated by Inspector Norton in his own words:
"The three men were scattered at about 100 yards apart, one on each side of the road, and one near the road; the man on the left side advanced within eighty yards of me, and then commenced firing; the man on the left charged and fired a double-barrelled gun; I cannot swear to the man on the right firing his rifle, but he fired a revolver; the man I supposed to be O'Meally took up his position about eighty yards from me; Hall and the prisoner a little farther off; O'Meally cried out, "Throw up your arms," repeatedly; they then commenced firing with revolvers; we fired several return shots; they might have fired fifteen or eighteen shots; my ammunition was then expended, and O'Meally with Hall rode up to me; the latter presented a revolver at me, while O'Meally and Daley ran after the black-fellow, and fired after him; after a few minutes, Hall rode up to me, and said that they had nothing against, me and that I might go.
![]() |
| Artists impression of Billy fleeing after Norton capture. c. 1933. NLA. |
With his commanding officer held by the bushrangers. Upon reaching the station, Dargin arranged for a rider to take the news of Inspector Norton's capture to Forbes. A contemporary newspaper article provides more insight into Dargin's actions during this intense episode, highlighting his courage and resourcefulness in a bid to save his leader:
George Boyd, a new recruit to the NSW police force at the time, would later recall the frenzy in Sydney following the news of Inspector Norton's capture. As he tells it, the force was in a flurry of activity, scrambling to assemble a team of troopers to be dispatched as soon as possible. The goal was clear: apprehend the trio responsible for Norton's capture and end their reign of terror in the region.
Boyd's recounting gives a vivid picture of the urgency and intensity that gripped the police force in response to the lawlessness of Ben Hall and his gang. Despite their efforts, the challenges of distance and limited resources made it difficult for the law enforcement of the time to effectively contain the bushrangers' activities. The Sun, Monday 19th August 1912:
Boyd's career coincided with a tumultuous period in Australian history, marked by the notorious activities of bushrangers. The most infamous of these events involved the audacious capture of Inspector Norton by bushranger Ben Hall, which sent shock-waves of disbelief and embarrassment throughout the New South Wales Police Force.
The bushrangers' shrewdness, their superior horses, and weaponry, and most crucially, their intimate knowledge of the local terrain, often gave them the upper hand in their confrontations with the police. Their exploits became a source of both fear and fascination for the colonists, a vivid manifestation of the harsh realities and unpredictable nature of life in the Australian outback. While Norton was capture Sir Frederick Pottinger was in Sydney for the conclusion of the Escort Trials and Manns' death sentence announcement. However, with the Lachlan deteriorating Pottinger was dispatched post haste to regain the upper hand and reinvigorate the police pursuit of Hall Gilbert and O'Meally.
Norton released and Pottinger back in the saddle an intriguing postscript to these events was found in a report from 'Bell’s Life in Sydney and Sporting Chronicle.' The publication speculated about the potentially tragic consequences had it been Sir Frederick Pottinger, not Norton, at the mercy of the bushrangers. It suggested that Pottinger's encounter with the bushrangers could have ended not in capture but in bloodshed, a sobering reflection on the danger that these lawmen faced in their tireless pursuit of justice.
![]() |
| Ben Hall's pursuers promotions in March 1863. |
On 7th March 1863, an article in 'Bell’s Life in Sydney and Sporting Chronicle' shed light on the palpable frustration permeating the town. The citizens had reached a tipping point; they were thoroughly exasperated with the bushrangers' continued reign of terror, their relentless and indiscriminate acts of violence.
The newspaper provided a chilling insight into the ruthless nature of Ben Hall. It suggested that only a combination of Hall's poor marksmanship or a stroke of tremendous luck saved the disarmed Inspector Norton from a fatal bullet. This grim scenario underscored the cold-blooded nature of Hall, painting a picture of a man who was not just willing, but ready, to kill without a second thought.
While on patrol, Sir Frederick found himself near the very scene of Norton's harrowing encounter. His reliable aide, Billy Dargin, pointed out the specific spot where Ben Hall had made his ruthless attempt on Norton's life. Eager to piece together the chilling event, Sir Frederick dismounted his horse and approached the tree where the remnants of Hall's missed bullets lingered.
A closer examination of the tree revealed the close brush with death Norton had experienced. The bullets had struck alarmingly close to where Norton's head had been, a stark testament to his narrow escape. The sight of this grim memento stirred within Sir Frederick a renewed determination to bring Ben Hall to justice. The calculated violence of the bushrangers had to be curtailed, and Sir Frederick was resolved to be the one to do it.
As the dust settled on the events surrounding Inspector Norton's return, the grim spectre of the gallows loomed over convicted Eugowra Escort robbers, Manns and Bow. While Fordyce's death sentence had been commuted to life imprisonment, Manns and Bow languished on death row, awaiting their imminent fate.
Yet hope was not entirely lost for the condemned pair. The citizens of Sydney, in an act of collective mercy, petitioned for the commuting of Manns and Bow's death sentences to life imprisonment. The appeals echoed through the city, a testament to the compassion that underscored the community's sense of justice.
The media, too, continued to cast a critical eye over the proceedings. Doubts were raised over the credibility of the evidence provided by Daniel Charters, adding another layer of intrigue to the case. For the first time, Benjamin Hall and John O'Meally, two notorious figures, were explicitly named in the press as members of the gang involved in the Eugowra Gold robbery of June 1862. This revelation injected a new dimension to the narrative, linking the events of the present with the unresolved crimes of the past. The Maitland Mercury and Hunter River General Advertiser, 17th March 1863;
![]() |
| Horse Theft. |
However, the end of the trial did not signal the end of the drama. A tantalising piece of gossip circulated among the populace. It was rumoured that the bushrangers had sent a bold message to the government through their confidante, Billy Dargin.
The message was said to contain a chilling ultimatum: if any executions were carried out on their incarcerated comrades, Inspector Norton would pay the price. It was a threat, framed as a polite missive, which demonstrated the audacity of the bushrangers and the desperate lengths they were willing to go to in order to protect their own. The alleged threat further heightened the tension between the bushrangers and the authorities, adding a perilous new dimension to an already volatile situation.
A few days after Manns' execution, the 'Goulburn Herald' of Saturday 7th March 1863, weighed in on the alleged threat to Norton. As was often the case during these turbulent times, the writer sprinkled the account with a touch of derision aimed at the police. The article provided yet another angle on the unfolding drama, showcasing the media's critical and often mocking commentary on the authorities' struggle to maintain law and order against the audacious bushrangers.
Frederick Lowry was no stranger to the life of lawlessness. He had spent a significant part of his life at Cockatoo Island, sharing his confines with none other than the infamous Frank Gardiner, the former leader of the gang that now prowled the Lachlan region. Their time together in incarceration had forged a bond between them, binding them through shared experiences and hardened resolve.
In February 1863, Lowry made headlines for a daring escape from Bathurst Gaol. His freedom was hard-won, and his arrival in the Lambing Flat area symbolised a new beginning. Braving the challenges and risks of life on the run, Lowry decided to establish his presence in the Lachlan area, ready to follow in the footsteps of Gardiner and, in time, to carve his own path in the annals of local lore.
In the midst of the gathering, a scuffle broke out, the details of which remain a topic of whispered speculation. What is known, however, is that the altercation ended with a man named Mr. Foran suffering a gunshot wound to his chest. The source of the bullet was traced back to Frederick Lowry.
The severity of Foran's injury resulted in Lowry's subsequent capture and incarceration by those present spurred into action at Foran crashing to the ground. In Bathurst Gaol Lowry with a number of others would hatch his plan to escape, further solidifying his place in the regional history as an infamous outlaw.
Outrage with Fire-arms, Bathurst Free Press, Jan. 3:
These circumstances painted a complex picture of Hall, a man who, despite his outlaw status, seemed to enjoy the privileges of wealth and community support. His story is an illustration of the paradoxes that can exist within one person's life, underscoring the complexity of human nature and the unpredictability of fate. February 1863:
An incident from around 1863 underscores this fear. Staff from the Pinnacle public house faced a stern reprimand, having attempted to scapegoat the bushrangers for squandering provisions and alcohol. Hall's reputation was such that his name was used to cover their own transgressions.
Years later, in 1889, the Freeman's Journal published a letter by an anonymous correspondent who called himself Viator. He recounted an encounter at the Pinnacle public house that took place during a journey in 1863. He had been a passenger on a coach that had a chance meeting with the notorious trio: Ben Hall, John Gilbert, and John O'Meally.
Published on November 23, 1889, Viator's letter offered a glimpse into the past, detailing a direct encounter with these infamous outlaws, a brush with the annals of the Australian bushranging history. The narrative, tinged with the fear and respect these men commanded, enriched the legacy of Ben Hall and his cohorts.
![]() |
| Captain Henry Zouch. c. 1880's. |
![]() |
| O'Meally's holdings Weddin Mountains. c. 1863. |
However, the advocated safe period for the police was short term. During the lull, Hall appeared to have retreated to his former stockman's haunts out in the back-country of the Bland Plains and camped around Lake Cowal and Humbug Creek. Areas which Hall knew intimately. In this wild country, Hall had maintained many friends. Hall's Bland haunt was described as:
Furthermore, as well as the Bland, it came to light that Hall often appeared at his former home of Sandy Creek, where his latest child Mary and her mother Susan Prior continued to live. However, events at Sandy Creek would shortly alter to disastrous, culminating in a confrontation with Pottinger and his troop. As Hall and the gang had dropped off the radar, elements in the press had attempted to paint Sir Frederick Pottinger and his men as being a law unto themselves. Much criticism from many quarters of the region was directed at Pottinger, who dismissed any notion of unfairness and wreaked havoc against anyone suspected of sympathies toward the bushranging fraternity.
Newspaper's such as the Empire (1850-1875) had an editorial flair that appeared to garner support to the sympathisers and harbourers of bushrangers. The paper often censured the police over their perceived brutality towards the smaller, less well to do settlers who provided a helping hand for a gratuity from the hunted. Those sympathisers were noted as:
On the other hand, some more conservative newspapers like the Sydney Morning Herald viewed the troubles and difficulties faced by Sir Frederick Pottinger more sympathetically. The root of those difficulties was a continued 'Cone of Silence' employed by many inhabitants. Therefore, the more conservative papers judged the inspector far more fairly, such as, 'The Courier' Brisbane:
Nonetheless, under the spotlight of numerous failures, in particular, Frank Gardiner. Sir Frederick Pottinger was hungry for success. Just one victory would do, and for a brief moment, Pottinger’s luck bore fruit. Sir Frederick's Pottinger's instinct's regarding the Weddin Mountains/Pinnacle/Wheogo areas as a continuous haven for bushrangers, including Ben Hall's previous run at Sandy Creek and his former in-laws at Wheogo as well as the nearby Feehily's Pinnacle Station were places Pottinger considered his best opportunity to 'nail the bastards'. The Pinnacle bordered the same name's range with its outlying miner's huts and a heavily wooded scrubland. Pottinger's dogged patrolling paid off.
![]() |
| Patsy Daley 1874 |
Here the loyal and brave tracker Billy Dargin gave evidence about Daley's involvement with Hall and O'Meally in Inspector Norton's kidnapping. However, Aboriginal Billy's grasp of the court's legalities and proceedings was questioned by the legal eagles. However, after some deliberation by the magistrate, Mr D. W. Irving, J.P. regarding Billy Dargin's understanding of an Oath, the police tracker was asked about his own knowledge of the oath procedure and replied:
"Ben Hall then charged witness, and ordered him to bail up against a tree; said—he would see them d--d first. Witness then jumped off his horse and taking up a pistol he had thrown upon the ground, threw it at Ben Hall, hitting him on the jaw; Ben Hall then called out to Daley to come on with his revolvers. By the Bench: The pistol struck Ben Hall on the right ear. Prisoner Daley; was engaged loading two revolvers. Ben Hall called out, come on with the revolvers. Young O’Meally then came up and gave one of his revolvers to Ben Hall. Witness then took off his boots, leggings, and coat, and run off, throwing sticks at his pursuers the whole time. They, chased him in this manner for eight-miles, firing all the way, till they got near the Pinnacle Mountain. They told him they would "whollop" him to death with sticks; witness replied, he would like to have a chance with him; he would forgive them if they killed him with sticks. They then went under the Pinnacle, and picked up some small pebble stones and fired them at witness. The prisoner Daley said, "I like you, you white livered scoundrel. “Witness in reply told Daley, "He would like him better if he would get off his horse. Afterwards asked them if they would go to the Pinnacle, and he would shout for them. Ben Hall said, "Well, old man, you're a plucky one, and we'll let you off, but we'll stick up your barracks to-night." They then went off to the Pinnacle—To the Bench "Am certain the prisoner is the same man who was with Ben Hall when the police barracks were stuck up. Followed them at that time, with Prince Charlie and trooper Hollister. Chased them for three miles and a half, and should have taken them but for Hollister getting thrown from his horse through running against a tree. Saw the prisoner Daley snap his revolver three times at Charlie. —To Sir Frederick Pottinger: Can swear that prisoner is one of the three men who stuck up Mr Norton, and likewise to being the same we chased with the trooper Hollister. —To the Bench. Identified the prisoner directly when he was taken into custody by Sir Frederick Pottinger.⁷¹
![]() |
| John Wilson, mate of Sir Frederick and John Maguire. |
However, Wilson moved to evict them all through his friend Sir Frederick Pottinger. It's worth noting that as early as 1861, there had been efforts in the New South Wales Legislature to remove defaulting renters and undesirables from leased Crown Lands. The Cockatoo Squatter. Prior to Wilson purchase, Ben Hall held legal tenure over Sandy Creek. However, the Crown Lands Occupation Act of 1861, enacted in response to those criminal activities, impacted the lease of Sandy Creek. This resulted in Wilson taking up the lease in late 1862. A factor that played a role in Hall losing his hold over the land was his failure to sign the lease transfer to Wilson and settle any rent arrears with the government became untenable. John Maguire washed his hands of the situation.
In March 1863, officials from the Lands Office, including a certain Mr Crosby, were instructed to pass on information about individuals unlawfully occupying Crown Land to the police in Forbes. This list included Ben Hall's homestead and those in occupancy. Consequently, Hall's hut became one of the first in the Lachlan District to be subjected to these impending, arbitrary evictions. As set out under section 32 of the Act, which stated in part:
The severity of these actions, which left a mother and her baby exposed to the harsh elements, (It rained on the day) stirred discontent among Hall's close associates and significant landowners, one being William Jameison of Back Creek Station.
Nevertheless, Pottinger remained steadfast in his conviction that Hall's former residence was serving as a sanctuary for the elusive bushranger and other criminals. He perceived these individuals as of 'low character', a prejudiced view possibly that was influenced by his aristocratic background.
The destruction of Hall's home was a bold demonstration of Pottinger's intention to exert control over those he considered part of a criminal underclass. The inspector aimed to send a strong message that the police were a force to be respected and obeyed, not hindered.
In June 1863, Pottinger relayed a memorandum justifying his actions to the Inspector-General of police, Captain McLerie. The document underscored Pottinger's disdain for the class of people who, in his view, operated under a 'cone of silence' when dealing with the authorities. An extract follows:
A correspondant noted Hall's view where Hall stated during a robbery:
That he had no alternative, as it
was impossible for him to escape, and that any attempt to do so,
would result in his immediate destruction by the hands of his friends
who looked to him for tribute as the price of his security. We
believe there is a great deal of truth in what this freebooter said;
for it is not probable that those who have so long fattened on his
ill-gotten gains would quietly submit to his quitting the scene of
his exploits, profitable to them although so hazardous to him.- Goulburn Herald and Chronicle 7 Dec 1864.
The apparent sympathy and assistance given to the bushrangers caused considerable frustration among the New South Wales Police, who sought stronger powers from Parliament to act against those suspected of providing safe havens.
However, the destruction of Ben Hall's home marked a significant step by the government in addressing the issue of unlawful occupancy. It was part of the government's broader strategy to tackle the problem of squatters who were residing on land without proper leasing agreements. However, these harsh actions did not go without criticism, with some sections of the press expressing strong disapproval of the government and police's behaviour. These critics argued that attempting to suppress support for bushrangers by any means necessary was an overreach of power. 'Sydney Morning Herald', April 28th, 1863; Dispossession of Illegal Squatters:![]() |
| Constable John Bohan who would assist Constable Hollister at the burning of Hall's home, and later act in Hall's death. |
| Hollister's actual diary entry, March 1863. Courtesy R.A.H.S. |
![]() |
| Rare portrait of William Jameison father of bushranger John Jameison. c. 1860. |
Not long after Jameison's candid letter surfaced, he died under suspicious circumstances following a fall from his horse near Goulburn. His death was a shock to all. To this day his death swirls in mystery.
While Jameison in his dealings had shown both admiration and criticism for Pottinger, his thoughts on the police's conduct, especially on the occasion of the incineration, were further articulated in another letter sent to the editor of 'The Sydney Morning Herald.' This letter was shared by John A. Hux after his death revealing more of Jamieson's insights and opinions about the controversial law enforcement practices of the time.
![]() |
| Colonial Secretary Mr Charles Cowper. c. 1870's. |
Pottinger's memorandum was presented to the NSW Legislative Assembly with the intent to placate members' concerns by providing a comprehensive account of the law enforcement's challenges in policing such a vast, largely uninhabited and desolate portion of the state. The document illustrated Pottinger's conduct and underscored the difficulties faced by other commanders in an untamed territory, where their efforts were often unappreciated and scorned by insulated parliamentarians who rarely ventured beyond Macquarie Street.
Intriguingly, Pottinger addressed the issue of Ben Hall's home's destruction in a rather offhand manner, attributing the decision to John Wilson. It highlighted the complexity of the circumstances, and the delicate balance between law enforcement and individual rights in a region often dictated by lawlessness.
Author's Note: The death of William Jamieson at the time was considered a mystery;
![]() |
| Joseph Jehoshaphat Harpur. (1810-1878) |
On the day of the police action, Ben Hall was present, and his attempts to distract the police and engage them in a confrontation were met with dismissal. This refusal to be drawn away from their mission by Hall led to considerable ridicule of Pottinger by Mr Harpur. As documented in the Parliamentary Hansard, Harpur praised Hall's courageous attempt to divert the police's attention. Still, it was insufficient to deter the determined and resolute Sir Frederick Pottinger. This incident's narrative highlights the tension and conflict between the bushrangers and the police and their families.
From that point onwards, Hall wholeheartedly embraced a path of criminality, throwing himself willingly into the arms of 'Hades'. As the years passed, the charred remnants of Ben Hall's once cherished home stood as a stark reminder of life irrevocably changed. The remains of his house visited and recorded by R. Fitzgerald of Wamboyne in 1876, were a tangible testament to the personal tragedy and lawless exploits that marked Ben Hall's infamous legacy when Fitzgerald writing for the 'Wyalong Advocate' in 1919 commented:
However, after the deed was done in a surprise statement, the Lands Minister, Mr Robinson, denied that Hall's home was incinerated as means of the Crown Lands Act.
![]() |
| John Wilson's claim on Wheogo Station. |
Despite their sudden eviction, these women continued to support Hall, providing him with valuable information, food, and other necessities. On sight of the traps Hall, spurring his horse into a gallop, Pottinger and his troopers charged towards Hall and his companion, John O'Meally, hoping to cut off their escape. But as night descended, the bushrangers vanished into the thick pine scrub. They abandoned their equipment in their haste, and Hall even left his horse behind.
In the wake of this pursuit, Pottinger telegraphed the Inspector General of Police in Sydney, recounting the events of March 18, 1863. He described his encounter with Hall and O'Meally, shedding light on the close ties between the two outlaws. The presence of O'Meally with Hall, not long after the murder of publican Cirkel at Stoney Creek, Young raised suspicions about Hall's involvement in the brutal act at 'The Miners Home Inn'.
In the aftermath of the chase, Susan Prior's younger brother, William, was apprehended and intensely questioned about Hall's whereabouts. Despite their hardships, Hall's network of supporters remained resilient, their loyalty seemingly unswayed by the ruthless tactics of law enforcement.
![]() |
| William Hollister. c. 1870's. Courtesy of R.A.H.S. |
![]() |
| William Hollister. NSW Police Employment Record May 1862. New South Wales, Australia, Registers of Police Employment, 1847-1885. |
![]() |
| Hollister's diary, March 1863. |
In an attempt to address these concerns, Sir Frederick Pottinger, responsible for the Lachlan Police District, submitted a memorandum to parliament. This memo, previously requested by the Colonial Secretary, contained a detailed account of Pottinger's conduct and his experience overseeing the district's policing. Furthermore, it provided an insightful depiction of the territory under his jurisdiction.
Pottinger's goal was clear: to shed light on the enormous challenges the police force faced, given the district's sheer vastness and complex social dynamics. He hoped that by presenting an in-depth view of his tasks, he could quell the mounting criticism and bolster understanding among the honourable members of the intricacies and tribulations encountered in his line of duty.
![]() |
| Sir Frederick Pottinger in the uniform of Inspector. c. 1864. |
Adding to the turmoil, the New South Wales Police Gazette entries in the early months of 1863 were inundated with crime reports from 'the interior'. This rampant criminal activity seemed insurmountable for the police in the afflicted districts. As such, many holdups and robberies often went unreported due to victim apathy and a prevailing sentiment that the police were reluctant to respond in any significant manner.
Ernest Bowler, a contemporary observer, exemplified this attitude of indifference. Bowler recounted a personal experience of being held up by Ben Hall's gang members, an incident he chose not to report, highlighting the general sense of futility many felt regarding police intervention at the time. 'The Moleskin Gentry'; by Frederick Howard. Ernest explains:
Note on Earnest Bowler; FORBES, Monday, 7th September 1896.- "This morning news was brought to the town of the death of Mr Ernest Ulysses Bowler, managing partner for Messrs. Suttor and Co, of Boyd station, about 20 miles from Forbes. The deceased gentleman had been suffering from a weak heart for some years and as he was 67 years of age, his demise was not altogether unexpected. He was judging at the Grenfell show that week and returned home on Saturday. On Sunday night he retired to bed in his usual health but awoke at about 2 o'clock and died in less than half an hour. His remains will be brought into Forbes tomorrow for interment. Mr Bowler was the son of Major Bowler a well-known colonist of the early days. Mr Earnest Bowler was one of the earliest pioneers of the Lachlan country and has been a resident of this part of the country for about fifty years. He was greatly respected in this district and great sympathy is expressed with his family. He leaves a widow, one son, and one daughter."
![]() |
| Electric Telegraph. Image courtesy NLA. |
Suddenly crime reporting in the 1860s took a great leap forward through the newly installed and innovative Telegraph line. The line became a vital artery for McLerie, funnelling reports of crimes committed throughout the vast police territories under his command almost instantly. Despite the telegraph's relative speed, it often could remain up to two weeks for the Police Gazette to be relayed, assessed, printed and dispatched via mail coach to the relevant police districts. Officers, eager to capture the lucrative bounties on offer for criminals like Ben Hall, Gilbert, O'Meally, and Gardiner, would often take the initiative and launch a pursuit prior to the receipt of these reports.
The first Telegraph line in New South Wales was constructed between Sydney and Liverpool, spanning a distance of 20 miles, and was operational by 30th December 1857. By 1858, the Liverpool line was extended to Albury on the New South Wales-Victorian border, covering over 300 miles. Importantly, this route traversed through the Southern and Western police districts of New South Wales, bringing real-time communication to the doorstep of these remote communities. By 1861, Sydney was linked to Brisbane by telegraph, marking a significant shift in the way information was shared and potentially shifting the balance in the police's battle against bushrangers such as Ben Hall.
![]() |
| Inspector-General of NSW Police, Captain John M'lerie. c. 1863. Penzig. |
![]() |
| ".. too late there goes the telegraph." Image courtesy NLA. |
During Hall's early days as a stockman and his tenure at Sandy Creek, Ben Hall had built a network of relationships with individuals who held him in high regard. As he ventured into a life of bushranging, these connections proved invaluable, offering safe harbour to Hall and his partners. This support, coupled with his trusted 'Bush Telegraph' network, allowed the gang to remain elusive, frustrating the police and staying a step ahead of their pursuers. Despite their notorious exploits, their ability to remain under the radar was a testament to Hall's strategic foresight and his careful cultivation of relationships throughout his life.
![]() |
| 'inundated Plain' Image courtesy NLA. |
For the men on the force, already strained from their relentless pursuit of Hall and his gang, the inclement weather made their task even more taxing. They were now grappling with harsh, cold and damp conditions.
Meanwhile, it can be assumed that Ben Hall, far more acquainted with the land and its secrets, sought refuge in the warm embrace of a shepherd's hut or a supportive harbourer's abode, protected from the downpour. He must have been acutely aware of how the harsh weather played to his advantage, erasing his tracks and further complicating the pursuit of Pottinger and his men. As reported:
![]() |
| Bushrangers in Australia By: Joseph Ratcliffe Skelton. c. 1910. |
Although initially limited in its reach, the new network commenced its operations as early as June 1860. It continued to expand gradually, eventually reaching all major settlements throughout NSW and beyond, following the path of the telegraph lines.
This emerging technology was praised for its potential to safeguard individuals' funds against the risk of robbery. The Money Order system represented a major leap forward in financial security, making it increasingly difficult for the likes of Ben Hall and his gang to intercept and seize people's hard-earned money. It marked a significant turning point in the fight against bushrangers, demonstrating the power of innovation in thwarting criminal activities, highlighted in the 'Moreton Bay Courier', Thursday 26th July 1860;
The press played a pivotal role in promoting this new financial service. They emphasised its safety features, ease of use, and the significant layer of protection it added against the ever-looming threat of bushrangers like Ben Hall and his gang. The push for the widespread adoption of Money Orders served as a testament to the times - a symbol of society's willingness to adapt and implement new strategies to counter the persistent menace of bushranging. In this way, the narrative of the notorious bushranger, Ben Hall, was not just a tale of crime and punishment but also a catalyst for significant societal and technological progress. 'The Sydney Morning Herald', 27th January 1863:
We hope that the Money Order Office will be brought into extensive use for the suppression of highway robbery. While the policeman is exerting himself to affect a cure, for that evil, the money order may facilitate the still more desirable process of prevention. A few days ago, the newspaper reports informed us of a disgusted bushranger, who bitterly complained that there was no use in robbing the particular mail that he was then rifling since it never contained anything worth carrying away. The fellow seemed to consider himself hardly used, and probably a continuance of such fruitless results to his enterprises would induce him to direct his genius to some other sphere of action possibly an honest one. We may fairly conclude that the days of gold escort robberies are at an end. Large bank bills, which are mostly payable to well-known firms in town, are not of much value to highwaymen; and in future, they must rest their hopes upon the registered letters containing small sums in bank notes, which may amount to something handsome in the aggregate. But if the Post-office money order be generally substituted for the banknote, as a means of remittance, even this source of revenue will be lost to the thief, who will hardly be likely to risk his life or liberty for the pleasure of seizing a few documents which are utterly worthless to him. Even if, in the extremity of his disappointment, he should destroy the orders, the money will not be lost, but will still be the property of the remitter. When a sum of ten pounds can thus be safely insured from all the perils of the road by the payment of a shilling, the person who neglects so simple and reasonable a precaution will hardly deserve pity for any loss that he may sustain. A traveller called upon to stand and deliver might complacently baffle his assailant by presenting him with a Post-office order. The business of the road would be done, and the professional highwayman would become an extinct animal.
Charles Herring, also known under the aliases Charles Burgess and Zahn, was a figure enshrouded in infamy and suspicion. Herring was a career criminal with a notorious reputation in the Fish River district, often seen in the company of known criminals like William Fogg and the recently executed John Peisley.
Lingering in Bathurst Gaol, Herring faced charges of fraud and suspicions regarding his involvement in the infamous Eugowra gold heist of June 1862. His criminal dossier was extensive, with a series of alleged offenses including false information, highway robbery, theft, and obtaining money under false pretenses. However, despite these numerous accusations, Herring often managed to escape conviction, leading to numerous discharges.On the cusp of his unexpected recruitment into the NSW police force, Herring, as Zahn, made a bold statement regarding the Eugowra affair, stating:
![]() |
| Herring with John Peisley 1861. NSW Police Gazette. |
Seemingly overnight, Zahn transitioned from a prisoner to a police trooper. In his initial ventures in this new role, he successfully apprehended one Henry Gibson, a known associate of Hall, who had previously claimed to be Hall's overseer on Sandy Creek. Notably, Zahn's diligent efforts nearly resulted in the capture of John Gilbert, Ben Hall, and John O'Meally in April 1863. Zahn was described as; 36 yrs old 5 ft 4 in tall light brown hair Hazel eyes thin pale face sallow complexion rather long sharp nose mole under right eye dresses smartly.
![]() |
| Mr Percy Scarr. c. 1905. |
However, Mr Scarr's evidence gave a revealing insight into Ben Hall's movements between the 14th and 28th of March, 1863. This information was consistent with a series of telegrams sent by Sir Frederick Pottinger to the Inspector-General regarding Hall's activities and Constable Hollister's diary account from the 14th of March. Pottinger had believed that Elen Maguire was the woman accompanying Ben Hall, but Scarr's testimony highlighted that Hall was in the company of a woman and a child, who were most likely Susan Prior and their daughter Mary. During this period, Elen Maguire was a mother to two children, aged five and two, and remained married to John Maguire and gave birth to another child in 1867. Sadly the child died . The other men confirmed to have been present were John Gilbert, John O'Meally and Gibson.
Meanwhile, as Gibson's court appearance unfolded, a tragedy was taking place in Forbes that would involve Elen Maguire, Bridget Hall, their stepmother Sarah Walsh nee Harpur. The tragedy was the serious illness of Elen's and Bridget's younger brother, 'The Warrigal', John Walsh, who was lying on his deathbed at 'The White Hart Inn', a hotel owned by John Wilson and managed by Hall's brother-in-law, John Maguire. Young 'Warrigal' had contracted Gaol Fever while being held in custody for his associations with Frank Gardiner. Sir Frederick Pottinger had persistently pushed for 'Warrigal' to be remanded, resulting in him being regularly presented in court. S.M.H 26th August 1862;
The death of young John Walsh, known as 'Warrigal,' left a sorrowful and unnoticed mark on history. His premature passing drew minimal attention and was quickly forgotten by the media, his demise fading from public consciousness as rapidly as it had appeared. John's body was buried in an unmarked or lost grave in Forbes Cemetery, marking the end of a life caught too early in the violent chaos of bushranging.
Despite his historical obscurity, local memory and dedicated efforts have sought to amend this neglect. Thanks to initiatives by the Forbes Historical Society and other dedicated groups, a memorial plaque has been placed in Forbes Cemetery. While it may not indicate his exact burial site, the plaque serves as a poignant reminder of his brief and tragic life, symbolising a young man entangled in the lawless era of his time.
![]() |
| John Fletcher Hargraves Attorney-General 2nd April 1860-31st July 1863 b. 1815 - d. 1885. NSW Parliament. |


























.jpg)






























































































































No comments:
Post a Comment